8 Assessment & Treatment of Substance Use Disorders

Before someone receives substance use disorder treatment, he or she must be both screened and assessed to determine whether services are needed and what type of treatment best matches the situation. The screening process is generally brief and provides feedback suggesting that someone does or does not have a problem requiring treatment.

Some screening tools can even be self-administered. Among the most-used screening instruments are the short four-question CAGE survey and the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test, or AUDIT. These tools provide insight into the presence of a problem and set up the next step of looking for helpful programs or interventions to address the problem.

Directory, Signposts, Wood, Grain, Board, Shield

In contrast to the screening process, assessment is a longer and more formal process conducted by a trained professional. The assessment helps to clarify the specific problem areas to address in treatment and at what level of intensity the person should be treated. The primary purpose of the information gathered during an assessment is to develop a comprehensive treatment plan for the client.

Later in this chapter is a chart created by the National Institute on Drug Abuse that highlights several available screening and assessment tools.

Once a substance use problem has been identified and a recommendation for treatment has been made, a person can begin receiving services. There are numerous options when it comes to treating substance use disorder. In the next chapter, we discuss the importance of having several options available and utilizing multiple pathways to recovery. Below, we look at the tools of the treatment provider and what a course of treatment might look like.


To start, let’s look at the story of someone who may need treatment services:

Sample Client

Jessica is a 26-year-old woman who recently received her second driving-under-the-influence (DUI) ticket and has been charged with a misdemeanor crime. She got her first DUI at age 21 and lost her license for one year. During that time, she completed a basic risk education DUI course and paid several thousand dollars in fines and attorney’s fees.

Jessica drinks with her friends on weekends, usually having five or six drinks per night. One of Jessica’s best friends growing up (Kaitlin) has started distancing herself from Jessica because she does not like how much their other friends are drinking. Kaitlin still occasionally invites Jessica to hang out, but Jessica refuses because there is no drinking involved.

In addition to alcohol, Jessica has started taking Xanax, a benzodiazepine. Although she has a prescription from her doctor to take Xanax to help treat her anxiety disorder, Jessica often takes more than prescribed, sometimes even mixing the pills with her alcohol consumption.

Jessica works a full-time job as a graphic designer and does most of her work from home. She says that she has little time to socialize during the week, so she looks forward to the weekend when she can see her friends and relax.

Now that she has a second DUI, Jessica has lost her license again, although she is not overly concerned because she can continue working from home and can walk or order a ride wherever she needs to go.

The court has ordered Jessica to have an evaluation done and to complete any treatment recommendations.

Although this is an imaginary client, the story probably applies to many of the clients who seek treatment. A screening of Jessica would reveal that she likely meets the criteria for a substance use disorder and should receive a full assessment. (Note that a screening tool alone never diagnoses a substance use disorder.) 

The exercise below gives you the opportunity to apply the knowledge you have learned in this book to her case.

 

Exercise

Consider the story of Jessica in the example above:

  • What stands out about her story?
  • Identify the drug or drugs that might be a problem for Jessica.
  • If you were evaluating Jessica, what are some of the questions you would ask her?
  • List at least three issues that might be addressed in a treatment plan for Jessica.
  • How many of the DSM-5 criteria for Substance Use Disorder (see list below in this chapter) can you identify from the brief description above?
  • How do her legal issues impact treatment?

Treatment services can be performed at several levels of care. These levels are defined by the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM).

ASAM Levels of Care

Recovery Residence

Level 1: Outpatient:

  • 1.0 Long-Term Remission Monitoring
  • 1.5 Outpatient Therapy
  • 1.7 Medically Managed Outpatient

Level 2 IOP/HIOP:

  • 2.1 Intensive Outpatient (IOP)
  • 2.5 High-Intensity Outpatient (HIOP)
  • 2.7 Medically Managed Intensive Outpatient

Level 3 Residential:

  • 3.1 Clinically Managed Low-Intensity Residential
  • 3.5 Clinically Managed High-Intensity Residential
  • 3.7 Medially Managed Residential

Level 4 Inpatient

  • Medically Managed Inpatient

This video describes the process of applying the ASAM dimensions to determine an appropriate level of treatment service:

 

A critical part of the assessment is recommending the appropriate level of care based on the client’s bio-psycho-social needs. The higher the level of care, the more intense the treatment. Other issues to consider are the client’s level of motivation, payment source, transportation, and childcare needs. If a client requires medical detoxification, that should be completed prior to beginning treatment.

It is also a good idea to involve a client’s physician when possible. In the exercise involving Jessica, she would benefit from a medical evaluation to determine if she can safely withdraw from two potentially life-threatening drugs, alcohol and Xanax.


Flip through the cards below to review the levels of treatment care.


Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment: A Research-Based Guide (NIDA)

Preface

Drug addiction is a complex illness.

It is characterized by intense and, at times, uncontrollable drug craving, along with compulsive drug seeking and use that persist even in the face of devastating consequences. This update of the National Institute on Drug Abuse’s Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment is intended to address addiction to a wide variety of drugs, including nicotine, alcohol, and illicit and prescription drugs. It is designed to serve as a resource for healthcare providers, family members, and other stakeholders trying to address the myriad problems faced by patients in need of treatment for drug abuse or addiction.

Addiction affects multiple brain circuits, including those involved in reward and motivation, learning and memory, and inhibitory control over behavior. That is why addiction is a brain disease. Some individuals are more vulnerable than others to becoming addicted, depending on the interplay between genetic makeup, age of exposure to drugs, and other environmental influences. While a person initially chooses to take drugs, over time the effects of prolonged exposure on brain functioning compromise that ability to choose, and seeking and consuming the drug become compulsive, often eluding a person’s self-control or willpower.

But addiction is more than just compulsive drug taking—it can also produce far-reaching health and social consequences. For example, drug abuse and addiction increase a person’s risk for a variety of other mental and physical illnesses related to a drug-abusing lifestyle or the toxic effects of the drugs themselves. Additionally, the dysfunctional behaviors that result from drug abuse can interfere with a person’s normal functioning in the family, the workplace, and the broader community.

Because drug abuse and addiction have so many dimensions and disrupt so many aspects of an individual’s life, treatment is not simple. Effective treatment programs typically incorporate many components, each directed to a particular aspect of the illness and its consequences. Addiction treatment must help the individual stop using drugs, maintain a drug-free lifestyle, and achieve productive functioning in the family, at work, and in society. Because addiction is a disease, most people cannot simply stop using drugs for a few days and be cured. Patients typically require long-term or repeated episodes of care to achieve the ultimate goal of sustained abstinence and recovery of their lives. Indeed, scientific research and clinical practice demonstrate the value of continuing care in treating addiction, with a variety of approaches having been tested and integrated in residential and community settings.

As we look toward the future, we will harness new research results on the influence of genetics and environment on gene function and expression (i.e., epigenetics), which are heralding the development of personalized treatment interventions. These findings will be integrated with current evidence supporting the most effective drug abuse and addiction treatments and their implementation, which are reflected in this guide.

Principles of Effective Treatment: Dr. Nora Volkow, Director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse

1.   Addiction is a complex but treatable disease that affects brain function and behavior. Drugs of abuse alter the brain’s structure and function, resulting in changes that persist long after drug use has ceased. This may explain why drug abusers are at risk for relapse even after long periods of abstinence and despite the potentially devastating consequences.

2.   No single treatment is appropriate for everyone. Treatment varies depending on the type of drug and the characteristics of the patients. Matching treatment settings, interventions, and services to an individual’s particular problems and needs is critical to his or her ultimate success in returning to productive functioning in the family, workplace, and society.

3.   Treatment needs to be readily available. Because drug-addicted individuals may be uncertain about entering treatment, taking advantage of available services the moment people are ready for treatment is critical. Potential patients can be lost if treatment is not immediately available or readily accessible. As with other chronic diseases, the earlier treatment is offered in the disease process, the greater the likelihood of positive outcomes.

4.   Effective treatment attends to multiple needs of the individual, not just his or her drug abuse. To be effective, treatment must address the individual’s drug abuse and any associated medical, psychological, social, vocational, and legal problems. It is also important that treatment be appropriate to the individual’s age, gender, ethnicity, and culture.

5.   Remaining in treatment for an adequate period of time is critical. The appropriate duration for an individual depends on the type and degree of the patient’s problems and needs. Research indicates that most addicted individuals need at least 3 months in treatment to significantly reduce or stop their drug use and that the best outcomes occur with longer durations of treatment. Recovery from drug addiction is a long-term process and frequently requires multiple episodes of treatment. As with other chronic illnesses, relapses to drug abuse can occur and should signal a need for treatment to be reinstated or adjusted. Because individuals often leave treatment prematurely, programs should include strategies to engage and keep patients in treatment.

6.   Behavioral therapies—including individual, family, or group counseling—are the most commonly used forms of drug abuse treatment.         Behavioral therapies vary in their focus and may involve addressing a patient’s motivation to change, providing incentives for abstinence, building skills to resist drug use, replacing drug-using activities with constructive and rewarding activities, improving problem-solving skills, and facilitating better interpersonal relationships. Also, participation in group therapy and other peer support programs during and following treatment can help maintain abstinence.

7.   Medications are an important element of treatment for many patients, especially when combined with counseling and other behavioral therapies. For example, methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone (including a new long-acting formulation) are effective in helping individuals addicted to heroin or other opioids stabilize their lives and reduce their illicit drug use. Acamprosate, disulfiram, and naltrexone are medications approved for treating alcohol dependence. For persons addicted to nicotine, a nicotine replacement product (available as patches, gum, lozenges, or nasal spray) or an oral medication (such as bupropion or varenicline) can be an effective component of treatment when part of a comprehensive behavioral treatment program.

8.   An individual’s treatment and services plan must be assessed continually and modified as necessary to ensure that it meets his or her changing needs. A patient may require varying combinations of services and treatment components during the course of treatment and recovery. In addition to counseling or psychotherapy, a patient may require medication, medical services, family therapy, parenting instruction, vocational rehabilitation, and/or social and legal services. For many patients, a continuing care approach provides the best results, with the treatment intensity varying according to a person’s changing needs.

9.   Many drug-addicted individuals also have other mental disorders. Because drug abuse and addiction—both of which are mental disorders—often co-occur with other mental illnesses, patients presenting with one condition should be assessed for the other(s). And when these problems co-occur, treatment should address both (or all), including the use of medications as appropriate.

10.   Medically assisted detoxification is only the first stage of addiction treatment and by itself does little to change long-term drug abuse. Although medically assisted detoxification can safely manage the acute physical symptoms of withdrawal and can, for some, pave the way for effective long-term addiction treatment, detoxification alone is rarely sufficient to help addicted individuals achieve long-term abstinence. Thus, patients should be encouraged to continue drug treatment following detoxification. Motivational enhancement and incentive strategies, begun at initial patient intake, can improve treatment engagement.

11.   Treatment does not need to be voluntary to be effective.  Sanctions or enticements from family, employment settings, and/or the criminal justice system can significantly increase treatment entry, retention rates, and the ultimate success of drug treatment interventions.

12.   Drug use during treatment must be monitored continuously, as lapses during treatment do occur. Knowing their drug use is being monitored can be a powerful incentive for patients and can help them withstand urges to use drugs. Monitoring also provides an early indication of a return to drug use, signaling a possible need to adjust an individual’s treatment plan to better meet his or her needs.

13.   Treatment programs should test patients for the presence of HIV/AIDS, hepatitis B and C, tuberculosis, and other infectious diseases as well as provide targeted risk-reduction counseling, linking patients to treatment if necessary. Typically, drug abuse treatment addresses some of the drug-related behaviors that put people at risk of infectious diseases. Targeted counseling focused on reducing infectious disease risk can help patients further reduce or avoid substance-related and other high-risk behaviors. Counseling can also help those who are already infected to manage their illness. Moreover, engaging in substance abuse treatment can facilitate adherence to other medical treatments. Substance abuse treatment facilities should provide onsite, rapid HIV testing rather than referrals to offsite testing—research shows that doing so increases the likelihood that patients will be tested and receive their test results. Treatment providers should also inform patients that highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has proven effective in combating HIV, including among drug-abusing populations, and help link them to HIV treatment if they test positive.

 

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do drug-addicted persons keep using drugs?

Nearly all addicted individuals believe at the outset that they can stop using drugs on their own, and most try to stop without treatment. Although some people are successful, many attempts result in failure to achieve long-term abstinence. Research has shown that long-term drug abuse results in changes in the brain that persist long after a person stops using drugs. These drug-induced changes in brain function can have many behavioral consequences, including an inability to exert control over the impulse to use drugs despite adverse consequences—the defining characteristic of addiction.

Understanding that addiction has such a fundamental biological component may help explain the difficulty of achieving and maintaining abstinence without treatment. Psychological stress from work, family problems, psychiatric illness, pain associated with medical problems, social cues (such as meeting individuals from one’s drug-using past), or environmental cues (such as encountering streets, objects, or even smells associated with drug abuse) can trigger intense cravings without the individual even being consciously aware of the triggering event. Any one of these factors can hinder attainment of sustained abstinence and make relapse more likely. Nevertheless, research indicates that active participation in treatment is an essential component for good outcomes and can benefit even the most severely addicted individuals.

 

What is drug addiction treatment?

Drug treatment is intended to help addicted individuals stop compulsive drug seeking and use. Treatment can occur in a variety of settings, take many different forms, and last for different lengths of time. Because drug addiction is typically a chronic disorder characterized by occasional relapses, a short-term, one-time treatment is usually not sufficient. For many, treatment is a long-term process that involves multiple interventions and regular monitoring. There are a variety of evidence-based approaches to treating addiction. Drug treatment can include behavioral therapy (such as cognitive-behavioral therapy or contingency management), medications, or their combination. The specific type of treatment or combination of treatments will vary depending on the patient’s individual needs and, often, on the types of drugs they use.

Treatment medications, such as methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone (including a new long-acting formulation), are available for individuals addicted to opioids, while nicotine preparations (patches, gum, lozenges, and nasal spray) and the medications varenicline and bupropion are available for individuals addicted to tobacco. Disulfiram, acamprosate, and naltrexone are medications available for treating alcohol dependence, which commonly co-occurs with other drug addictions, including addiction to prescription medications.

Key Takeaways

Drug addiction treatment can include medications, behavioral therapies, or a combination of both

Treatments for prescription drug abuse tend to be similar to those for illicit drugs that affect the same brain systems. For example, buprenorphine, used to treat heroin addiction, can also be used to treat addiction to opioid pain medications. Addiction to prescription stimulants, which affect the same brain systems as illicit stimulants like cocaine, can be treated with behavioral therapies, as there are not yet medications for treating addiction to these types of drugs.

Behavioral therapies can help motivate people to participate in drug treatment, offer strategies for coping with drug cravings, teach ways to avoid drugs and prevent relapse, and help individuals deal with relapse if it occurs. Behavioral therapies can also help people improve communication, relationship, and parenting skills, as well as family dynamics.

Many treatment programs employ both individual and group therapies. Group therapy can provide social reinforcement and help enforce behavioral contingencies that promote abstinence and a non- drug-using lifestyle. Some of the more established behavioral treatments, such as contingency management and cognitive-behavioral therapy, are also being adapted for group settings to improve efficiency and cost-effectiveness. However, particularly in adolescents, there can also be a danger of unintended harmful (or iatrogenic) effects of group treatment—sometimes group members (especially groups of highly delinquent youth) can reinforce drug use and thereby derail the purpose of the therapy. Thus, trained counselors should be aware of and monitor for such effects.

Because they work on different aspects of addiction, combinations of behavioral therapies and medications (when available) generally appear to be more effective than either approach used alone.  Finally, people who are addicted to drugs often suffer from other health (e.g., depression, HIV), occupational, legal, familial, and social problems that should be addressed concurrently. The best programs provide a combination of therapies and other services to meet an individual patient’s needs. Psychoactive medications, such as antidepressants, anti-anxiety agents, mood stabilizers, and antipsychotic medications, may be critical for treatment success when patients have co-occurring mental disorders such as depression, anxiety disorders (including post-traumatic stress disorder), bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia. In addition, most people with severe addiction abuse multiple drugs and require treatment for all substances abused.

 

Treatment for drug abuse and addiction is delivered in many different settings, using a variety of behavioral and pharmacological approaches.

 

How effective is drug addiction treatment?

In addition to stopping drug abuse, the goal of treatment is to return people to productive functioning in the family, workplace, and community. According to research that tracks individuals in treatment over extended periods, most people who get into and remain in treatment stop using drugs, decrease their criminal activity, and improve their occupational, social, and psychological functioning. For example, methadone treatment has been shown to increase participation in behavioral therapy and decrease both drug use and criminal behavior. However, individual treatment outcomes depend on the extent and nature of the patient’s problems, the appropriateness of treatment and related services used to address those problems, and the quality of interaction between the patient and his or her treatment providers.

Like other chronic diseases, addiction can be managed successfully. Treatment enables people to counteract addiction’s powerful disruptive effects on the brain and behavior and to regain control of their lives. The chronic nature of the disease means that relapsing to drug abuse is not only possible but also likely, with symptom recurrence rates similar to those for other well-characterized chronic medical illnesses—such as diabetes, hypertension, and asthma (see figure, “Comparison of Relapse Rates Between Drug Addiction and Other Chronic Illnesses”)—that also have both physiological and behavioral components.

Unfortunately, when relapse occurs many deem treatment a failure. This is not the case: Successful treatment for addiction typically requires continual evaluation and modification as appropriate, similar to the approach taken for other chronic diseases. For example, when a patient is receiving active treatment for hypertension and symptoms decrease, treatment is deemed successful, even though symptoms may recur when treatment is discontinued. For the addicted individual, lapses to drug abuse do not indicate failure—rather, they signify that treatment needs to be reinstated or adjusted, or that alternate treatment is needed (see figure, “Why is Addiction Treatment Evaluated Differently?”).

Is drug addiction treatment worth its cost?

Substance abuse costs our nation over $600 billion annually and treatment can help reduce these costs. Drug addiction treatment has been shown to reduce associated health and social costs by far more than the cost of the treatment itself. Treatment is also much less expensive than its alternatives, such as incarcerating addicted persons. For example, the average cost for 1 full year of methadone maintenance treatment is approximately $4,700 per patient, whereas 1 full year of imprisonment costs approximately $24,000 per person.

According to several conservative estimates, every dollar invested in addiction treatment programs yields a return of between $4 and $7 in reduced drug-related crime, criminal justice costs, and theft. When savings related to healthcare are included, total savings can exceed costs by a ratio of 12 to 1. Major savings to the individual and to society also stem from fewer interpersonal conflicts; greater workplace productivity; and fewer drug-related accidents, including overdoses and deaths.

How long does drug addiction treatment usually last?

Individuals progress through drug addiction treatment at various rates, so there is no predetermined length of treatment. However, research has shown unequivocally that good outcomes are contingent on adequate treatment length. Generally, for residential or outpatient treatment, participation for less than 90 days is of limited effectiveness, and treatment lasting significantly longer is recommended for maintaining positive outcomes. For methadone maintenance, 12 months is considered the minimum, and some opioid-addicted individuals continue to benefit from methadone maintenance for many years.

Treatment dropout is one of the major problems encountered by treatment programs; therefore, motivational techniques that can keep patients engaged will also improve outcomes. By viewing addiction as a chronic disease and offering continuing care and monitoring, programs can succeed, but this will often require multiple episodes of treatment and readily readmitting patients that have relapsed.

What helps people stay in treatment?

Because successful outcomes often depend on a person’s staying in treatment long enough to reap its full benefits, strategies for keeping people in treatment are critical. Whether a patient stays in treatment depends on factors associated with both the individual and the program. Individual factors related to engagement and retention typically include motivation to change drug-using behavior; degree of support from family and friends; and, frequently, pressure from the criminal justice system, child protection services, employers, or family. Within a treatment program, successful clinicians can establish a positive, therapeutic relationship with their patients. The clinician should ensure that a treatment plan is developed cooperatively with the person seeking treatment, that the plan is followed, and that treatment expectations are clearly understood. Medical, psychiatric, and social services should also be available.

Key Takeaways

Whether a patient stays in treatment depends on factors associated with both the individual and the program.

Because some problems (such as serious medical or mental illness or criminal involvement) increase the likelihood of patients dropping out of treatment, intensive interventions may be required to retain them. After a course of intensive treatment, the provider should ensure a transition to less intensive continuing care to support and monitor individuals in their ongoing recovery.

How do we get more substance-abusing people into treatment?

It has been known for many years that the “treatment gap” is massive—that is, among those who need treatment for a substance use disorder, few receive it. In 2011, 21.6 million persons aged 12 or older needed treatment for an illicit drug or alcohol use problem, but only 2.3 million received treatment at a specialty substance abuse facility.

Reducing this gap requires a multipronged approach. Strategies include increasing access to effective treatment, achieving insurance parity (now in its earliest phase of implementation), reducing stigma, and raising awareness among both patients and healthcare professionals of the value of addiction treatment. To assist physicians in identifying treatment need in their patients and making appropriate referrals, NIDA is encouraging widespread use of screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) tools for use in primary care settings through its NIDAMED initiative. SBIRT, which evidence shows to be effective against tobacco and alcohol use—and, increasingly, against abuse of illicit and prescription drugs—has the potential not only to catch people before serious drug problems develop, but also to identify people in need of treatment and connect them with appropriate treatment providers.

How can family and friends make a difference in the life of someone needing treatment?

Family and friends can play critical roles in motivating individuals with drug problems to enter and stay in treatment. Family therapy can also be important, especially for adolescents. Involvement of a family member or significant other in an individual’s treatment program can strengthen and extend treatment benefits.

How can the workplace play a role in substance abuse treatment?

Many workplaces sponsor Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) that offer short-term counseling and/or assistance in linking employees with drug or alcohol problems to local treatment resources, including peer support/recovery groups. In addition, therapeutic work environments that provide employment for drug-abusing individuals who can demonstrate abstinence have been shown not only to promote a continued drug-free lifestyle but also to improve job skills, punctuality, and other behaviors necessary for active employment throughout life. Urine testing facilities, trained personnel, and workplace monitors are needed to implement this type of treatment.

What role can the criminal justice system play in addressing drug addiction?

It is estimated that about one-half of State and Federal prisoners abuse or are addicted to drugs, but relatively few receive treatment while incarcerated. Initiating drug abuse treatment in prison and continuing it upon release is vital to both individual recovery and to public health and safety. Various studies have shown that combining prison- and community-based treatment for addicted offenders reduces the risk of both recidivism to drug-related criminal behavior and relapse to drug use—which, in turn, nets huge savings in societal costs. A 2009 study in Baltimore, Maryland, for example, found that opioid-addicted prisoners who started methadone treatment (along with counseling) in prison and then continued it after release had better outcomes (reduced drug use and criminal activity) than those who only received counseling while in prison or those who only started methadone treatment after their release.

Key Takeaways

Individuals who enter treatment under legal pressure have outcomes as favorable as those who enter treatment voluntarily.

The majority of offenders involved with the criminal justice system are not in prison but are under community supervision. For those with known drug problems, drug addiction treatment may be recommended or mandated as a condition of probation. Research has demonstrated that individuals who enter treatment under legal pressure have outcomes as favorable as those who enter treatment voluntarily.

The criminal justice system refers drug offenders into treatment through a variety of mechanisms, such as diverting nonviolent offenders to treatment; stipulating treatment as a condition of incarceration, probation, or pretrial release; and convening specialized courts, or drug courts, that handle drug offense cases. These courts mandate and arrange for treatment as an alternative to incarceration, actively monitor progress in treatment, and arrange for other services for drug-involved offenders.

The most effective models integrate criminal justice and drug treatment systems and services. Treatment and criminal justice personnel work together on treatment planning—including implementation of screening, placement, testing, monitoring, and supervision—as well as on the systematic use of sanctions and rewards. Treatment for incarcerated drug abusers should include continuing care, monitoring, and supervision after incarceration and during parole. Methods to achieve better coordination between parole/probation officers and health providers are being studied to improve offender outcomes.

What are the unique needs of women with substance use disorders?

Gender-related drug abuse treatment should attend not only to biological differences but also to social and environmental factors, all of which can influence the motivations for drug use, the reasons for seeking treatment, the types of environments where treatment is obtained, the treatments that are most effective, and the consequences of not receiving treatment. Many life circumstances predominate in women as a group, which may require a specialized treatment approach. For example, research has shown that physical and sexual trauma followed by post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is more common in drug-abusing women than in men seeking treatment. Other factors unique to women that can influence the treatment process include issues around how they come into treatment (as women are more likely than men to seek the assistance of a general or mental health practitioner), financial independence, and pregnancy and child care.

What are the unique needs of pregnant women with substance use disorders?

Using drugs, alcohol, or tobacco during pregnancy exposes not just the woman but also her developing fetus to the substance and can have potentially deleterious and even long-term effects on exposed children. Smoking during pregnancy can increase risk of stillbirth, infant mortality, sudden infant death syndrome, preterm birth, respiratory problems, slowed fetal growth, and low birth weight. Drinking during pregnancy can lead to the child developing fetal alcohol spectrum disorders, characterized by low birth weight and enduring cognitive and behavioral problems.

Prenatal use of some drugs, including opioids, may cause a withdrawal syndrome in newborns called neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). Babies with NAS are at greater risk of seizures, respiratory problems, feeding difficulties, low birth weight, and even death.

Research has established the value of evidence-based treatments for pregnant women (and their babies), including medications. For example, although no medications have been FDA-approved to treat opioid dependence in pregnant women, methadone maintenance combined with prenatal care and a comprehensive drug treatment program can improve many of the detrimental outcomes associated with untreated heroin abuse. However, newborns exposed to methadone during pregnancy still require treatment for withdrawal symptoms. Recently, another medication option for opioid dependence, buprenorphine, has been shown to produce fewer NAS symptoms in babies than methadone, resulting in shorter infant hospital stays. In general, it is important to closely monitor women who are trying to quit drug use during pregnancy and to provide treatment as needed.

What are the unique needs of adolescents with substance use disorders?

Adolescent drug abusers have unique needs stemming from their immature neurocognitive and psychosocial stage of development. Research has demonstrated that the brain undergoes a prolonged process of development and refinement from birth through early adulthood. Over the course of this developmental period, a young person’s actions go from being more impulsive to being more reasoned and reflective. In fact, the brain areas most closely associated with aspects of behavior such as decision-making, judgment, planning, and self-control undergo a period of rapid development during adolescence and young adulthood.

Adolescent drug abuse is also often associated with other co-occurring mental health problems. These include attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), oppositional defiant disorder, and conduct problems, as well as depressive and anxiety disorders.

Adolescents are also especially sensitive to social cues, with peer groups and families being highly influential during this time. Therefore, treatments that facilitate positive parental involvement, integrate other systems in which the adolescent participates (such as school and athletics), and recognize the importance of prosocial peer relationships are among the most effective. Access to comprehensive assessment, treatment, case management, and family-support services that are developmentally, culturally, and gender-appropriate is also integral when addressing adolescent addiction.

Medications for substance abuse among adolescents may in certain cases be helpful. Currently, the only addiction medications approved by FDA for people under 18 are over-the-counter transdermal nicotine skin patches, chewing gum, and lozenges (physician advice should be sought first).

Buprenorphine, a medication for treating opioid addiction that must be prescribed by specially trained physicians, has not been approved for adolescents, but recent research suggests it could be effective for those as young as 16. Studies are underway to determine the safety and efficacy of this and other medications for opioid-, nicotine-, and alcohol-dependent adolescents and for adolescents with co-occurring disorders.

Are there specific drug addiction treatments for older adults?

With the aging of the baby boomer generation, the composition of the general population is changing dramatically with respect to the number of older adults. Such a change, coupled with a greater history of lifetime drug use (than previous older generations), different cultural norms and general attitudes about drug use, and increases in the availability of psychotherapeutic medications, is already leading to greater drug use by older adults and may increase substance use problems in this population.

While substance abuse in older adults often goes unrecognized and therefore untreated, research indicates that currently available addiction treatment programs can be as effective for them as for younger adults.

Can a person become addicted to medications prescribed by a doctor?

Yes. People who abuse prescription drugs—that is, taking them in a manner or a dose other than prescribed, or taking medications prescribed for another person—risk addiction and other serious health consequences. Such drugs include opioid pain relievers, stimulants used to treat ADHD, and benzodiazepines to treat anxiety or sleep disorders. Indeed, in 2010, an estimated 2.4 million people 12 or older met criteria for abuse of or dependence on prescription drugs, the second most common illicit drug use after marijuana. To minimize these risks, a physician (or other prescribing health provider) should screen patients for prior or current substance abuse problems and assess their family history of substance abuse or addiction before prescribing a psychoactive medication and monitor patients who are prescribed such drugs. Physicians also need to educate patients about the potential risks so that they will follow their physician’s instructions faithfully, safeguard their medications, and dispose of them appropriately.

Is there a difference between physical dependence and addiction?

Yes. Addiction—or compulsive drug use despite harmful consequences—is characterized by an inability to stop using a drug; failure to meet work, social, or family obligations; and, sometimes (depending on the drug), tolerance and withdrawal. The latter reflect physical dependence in which the body adapts to the drug, requiring more of it to achieve a certain effect (tolerance) and eliciting drug-specific physical or mental symptoms if drug use is abruptly ceased (withdrawal). Physical dependence can happen with the chronic use of many drugs—including many prescription drugs, even if taken as instructed. Thus, physical dependence in and of itself does not constitute addiction, but it often accompanies addiction. This distinction can be difficult to discern, particularly with prescribed pain medications, for which the need for increasing dosages can represent tolerance or a worsening underlying problem, as opposed to the beginning of abuse or addiction.

How do other mental disorders coexisting with drug addiction affect drug addiction treatment?

Drug addiction is a disease of the brain that frequently occurs with other mental disorders. In fact, as many as 6 in 10 people with an illicit substance use disorder also suffer from another mental illness; and rates are similar for users of licit drugs—i.e., tobacco and alcohol. For these individuals, one condition becomes more difficult to treat successfully as an additional condition is intertwined. Thus, people entering treatment either for a substance use disorder or for another mental disorder should be assessed for the co-occurrence of the other condition. Research indicates that treating both (or multiple) illnesses simultaneously in an integrated fashion is generally the best treatment approach for these patients.

Is the use of medications like methadone and buprenorphine simply replacing one addiction with another?

No. Buprenorphine and methadone are prescribed or administered under monitored, controlled conditions and are safe and effective for treating opioid addiction when used as directed. They are administered orally or sublingually (i.e., under the tongue) in specified doses, and their effects differ from those of heroin and other abused opioids.

Heroin, for example, is often injected, snorted, or smoked, causing an almost immediate “rush,” or brief period of intense euphoria, that wears off quickly and ends in a “crash.” The individual then experiences an intense craving to use the drug again to stop the crash and reinstate the euphoria.

The cycle of euphoria, crash, and craving—sometimes repeated several times a day—is a hallmark of addiction and results in severe behavioral disruption. These characteristics result from heroin’s rapid onset and short duration of action in the brain.

In contrast, methadone and buprenorphine have gradual onsets of action and produce stable levels of the drug in the brain. As a result, patients maintained on these medications do not experience a rush, while they also markedly reduce their desire to use opioids.

If an individual treated with these medications tries to take an opioid such as heroin, the euphoric effects are usually dampened or suppressed. Patients undergoing maintenance treatment do not experience the physiological or behavioral abnormalities from rapid fluctuations in drug levels associated with heroin use. Maintenance treatments save lives—they help to stabilize individuals, allowing treatment of their medical, psychological, and other problems so they can contribute effectively as members of families and of society.

Where do 12-step or self-help programs fit into drug addiction treatment?

Self-help groups can complement and extend the effects of professional treatment. The most prominent self-help groups are those affiliated with Alcoholics Anonymous (AA), Narcotics Anonymous (NA), and Cocaine Anonymous (CA), all of which are based on the 12-step model. Most drug addiction treatment programs encourage patients to participate in self-help group therapy during and after formal treatment. These groups can be particularly helpful during recovery, offering an added layer of community-level social support to help people achieve and maintain abstinence and other healthy lifestyle behaviors over the course of a lifetime.

Can exercise play a role in the treatment process?

Yes. Exercise is increasingly becoming a component of many treatment programs and has proven effective, when combined with cognitive-behavioral therapy, at helping people quit smoking. Exercise may exert beneficial effects by addressing psychosocial and physiological needs that nicotine replacement alone does not, by reducing negative feelings and stress, and by helping prevent weight gain following cessation. Research to determine if and how exercise programs can play a similar role in the treatment of other forms of drug abuse is under way.

How does drug addiction treatment help reduce the spread of HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis C (HCV), and other infectious diseases?

Drug-abusing individuals, including injecting and non-injecting drug users, are at increased risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and other infectious diseases. These diseases are transmitted by sharing contaminated drug injection equipment and by engaging in risky sexual behavior sometimes associated with drug use. Effective drug abuse treatment is HIV/HCV prevention because it reduces activities that can spread disease, such as sharing injection equipment and engaging in unprotected sexual activity. Counseling that targets a range of HIV/HCV risk behaviors provides an added level of disease prevention.

Drug abuse treatment is HIV and hepatitis C prevention.

Injection drug users who do not enter treatment are up to six times more likely to become infected with HIV than those who enter and remain in treatment. Participation in treatment also presents opportunities for HIV screening and referral to early HIV treatment. In fact, recent research from NIDA’s National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network showed that providing rapid onsite HIV testing in substance abuse treatment facilities increased patients’ likelihood of being tested and of receiving their test results. HIV counseling and testing are key aspects of superior drug abuse treatment programs and should be offered to all individuals entering treatment. Greater availability of inexpensive and unobtrusive rapid HIV tests should increase access to these important aspects of HIV prevention and treatment.

Drug addiction is a complex disorder that can involve virtually every aspect of an individual’s functioning—in the family, at work and school, and in the community.

Because of addiction’s complexity and pervasive consequences, drug addiction treatment typically must involve many components. Some of those components focus directly on the individual’s drug use; others, like employment training, focus on restoring the addicted individual to productive membership in the family and society enabling him or her to experience the rewards associated with abstinence.

Treatment for drug abuse and addiction is delivered in many different settings using a variety of behavioral and pharmacological approaches. In the United States, more than 14,500 specialized drug treatment facilities provide counseling, behavioral therapy, medication, case management, and other types of services to persons with substance use disorders.

Along with specialized drug treatment facilities, drug abuse and addiction are treated in physicians’ offices and mental health clinics by a variety of providers, including counselors, physicians, psychiatrists, psychologists, nurses, and social workers. Treatment is delivered in outpatient, inpatient, and residential settings. Although specific treatment approaches often are associated with particular treatment settings, a variety of therapeutic interventions or services can be included in any given setting.

Because drug abuse and addiction are major public health problems, a large portion of drug treatment is funded by local, State, and Federal governments. Private and employer-subsidized health plans also may provide coverage for treatment of addiction and its medical consequences. Unfortunately, managed care has resulted in shorter average stays, while a historical lack of or insufficient coverage for substance abuse treatment has curtailed the number of operational programs. The recent passage of parity for insurance coverage of mental health and substance abuse problems will hopefully improve this state of affairs. Health Care Reform (i.e., the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, “ACA”) also stands to increase the demand for drug abuse treatment services and presents an opportunity to study how innovations in service delivery, organization, and financing can improve access to and use of them.

Types of Treatment Programs

Research studies on addiction treatment typically have classified programs into several general types or modalities. Treatment approaches and individual programs continue to evolve and diversify, and many programs today do not fit neatly into traditional drug addiction treatment classifications.

Most, however, start with detoxification and medically managed withdrawal, often considered the first stage of treatment. Detoxification, the process by which the body clears itself of drugs, is designed to manage the acute and potentially dangerous physiological effects of stopping drug use. As stated previously, detoxification alone does not address the psychological, social, and behavioral problems associated with addiction and therefore does not typically produce lasting behavioral changes necessary for recovery. Detoxification should thus be followed by a formal assessment and referral to drug addiction treatment.

Because it is often accompanied by unpleasant and potentially fatal side effects stemming from withdrawal, detoxification is often managed with medications administered by a physician in an inpatient or outpatient setting; therefore, it is referred to as “medically managed withdrawal.” Medications are available to assist in the withdrawal from opioids, benzodiazepines, alcohol, nicotine, barbiturates, and other sedatives.

Long-Term Residential Treatment

Long-term residential treatment provides care 24 hours a day, generally in non-hospital settings. The best-known residential treatment model is the therapeutic community (TC), with planned lengths of stay of between 6 and 12 months. TCs focus on the “resocialization” of the individual and use the program’s entire community—including other residents, staff, and the social context—as active components of treatment. Addiction is viewed in the context of an individual’s social and psychological deficits, and treatment focuses on developing personal accountability and responsibility as well as socially productive lives. Treatment is highly structured and can be confrontational at times, with activities designed to help residents examine damaging beliefs, self-concepts, and destructive patterns of behavior and adopt new, more harmonious and constructive ways to interact with others.

Many TCs offer comprehensive services, which can include employment training and other support services, onsite. Research shows that TCs can be modified to treat individuals with special needs, including adolescents, women, homeless individuals, people with severe mental disorders, and individuals in the criminal justice system.

Short-Term Residential Treatment

Short-term residential programs provide intensive but relatively brief treatment based on a modified 12-step approach. These programs were originally designed to treat alcohol problems, but during the cocaine epidemic of the mid-1980s, many began to treat other types of substance use disorders. The original residential treatment model consisted of a 3- to 6-week hospital-based inpatient treatment phase followed by extended outpatient therapy and participation in a self-help group, such as AA. Following stays in residential treatment programs, it is important for individuals to remain engaged in outpatient treatment programs and/or aftercare programs. These programs help to reduce the risk of relapse once a patient leaves the residential setting.

Outpatient Treatment Programs

Outpatient treatment varies in the types and intensity of services offered. Such treatment costs less than residential or inpatient treatment and often is more suitable for people with jobs or extensive social supports. It should be noted, however, that low-intensity programs may offer little more than drug education. Other outpatient models, such as intensive day treatment, can be comparable to residential programs in services and effectiveness, depending on the individual patient’s characteristics and needs. In many outpatient programs, group counseling can be a major component. Some outpatient programs are also designed to treat patients with medical or other mental health problems in addition to their drug disorders.

Individualized Drug Counseling

Individualized drug counseling not only focuses on reducing or stopping illicit drug or alcohol use; it also addresses related areas of impaired functioning—such as employment status, illegal activity, and family/social relations—as well as the content and structure of the patient’s recovery program.

Through its emphasis on short-term behavioral goals, individualized counseling helps the patient develop coping strategies and tools to abstain from drug use and maintain abstinence. The addiction counselor encourages 12-step participation (at least one or two times per week) and makes referrals for needed supplemental medical, psychiatric, employment, and other services.

Group Counseling

Many therapeutic settings use group therapy to capitalize on the social reinforcement offered by peer discussion and to help promote drug-free lifestyles. Research has shown that when group therapy either is offered in conjunction with individualized drug counseling or is formatted to reflect the principles of cognitive-behavioral therapy or contingency management, positive outcomes are achieved. Currently, researchers are testing conditions in which group therapy can be standardized and made more community-friendly.

Treating Criminal Justice-Involved Drug Abusers and Addicted Individuals

Often, drug abusers come into contact with the criminal justice system earlier than other health or social systems, presenting opportunities for intervention and treatment prior to, during, after, or in lieu of incarceration. Research has shown that combining criminal justice sanctions with drug treatment can be effective in decreasing drug abuse and related crime. Individuals under legal coercion tend to stay in treatment longer and do as well as or better than those not under legal pressure. Studies show that for incarcerated individuals with drug problems, starting drug abuse treatment in prison and continuing the same treatment upon release—in other words, a seamless continuum of services—results in better outcomes: less drug use and less criminal behavior. 

Key Takeaways

  • Drug addiction can be treated, but it’s not simple. Addiction treatment must help the person do the following:
    • stop using drugs
    • stay drug-free
    • be productive in the family, at work, and in society
  • Successful treatment has several steps:
    • detoxification
    • behavioral counseling
    • medication (for opioid, tobacco, or alcohol addiction)
    • evaluation and treatment for co-occurring mental health issues such as depression and anxiety
    • long-term follow-up to prevent relapse
  • Medications and devices can be used to manage withdrawal symptoms, prevent relapse, and treat co-occurring conditions.
  • Behavioral therapies help patients
    • modify their attitudes and behaviors related to drug use
    • increase healthy life skills
    • persist with other forms of treatment, such as medication
  • People within the criminal justice system may need additional treatment services to treat drug use disorders effectively. However, many offenders don’t have access to the types of services they need.

SAMHSA Guide to MAT Medications, Counseling, and Related Conditions

Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT) is the use of medications, in combination with counseling and behavioral therapies, to provide a “whole-patient” approach to the treatment of substance use disorders. It is also important to address other health conditions during treatment.

MAT Medications

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved several different medications to treat alcohol and opioid use disorders MAT medications relieve the withdrawal symptoms and psychological cravings that cause chemical imbalances in the body. Medications used for MAT are evidence-based treatment options and do not just substitute one drug for another.

Methadone used to treat those with a confirmed diagnosis of Opioid Use Disorder can only be dispensed through a SAMHSA certified OTP. Some of the medications used in MAT are controlled substances due to their potential for misuse. Drugs, substances, and certain chemicals used to make drugs are classified by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) into five distinct categories, or schedules, depending upon a drug’s acceptable medical use and potential for misuse. Learn more about DEA drug schedules.

Alcohol Use Disorder Medications – Acamprosate, disulfiram, and naltrexone are the most common drugs used to treat alcohol use disorder. They do not provide a cure for the disorder but are most effective in people who participate in a MAT program.

  • Acamprosate – is for people in recovery, who are no longer drinking alcohol and want to avoid drinking. It works to prevent people from drinking alcohol, but it does not prevent withdrawal symptoms after people drink alcohol. It has not been shown to work in people who continue drinking alcohol, consume illicit drugs, and/or engage in prescription drug misuse and abuse. The use of acamprosate typically begins on the fifth day of abstinence, reaching full effectiveness in five to eight days. It is offered in tablet form and taken three times a day, preferably at the same time every day. The medication’s side effects may include diarrhea, upset stomach, appetite loss, anxiety, dizziness, and difficulty sleeping.
  • Disulfiram – treats chronic alcoholism and is most effective in people who have already gone through detoxification or are in the initial stage of abstinence. Offered in a tablet form and taken once a day, disulfiram should never be taken while intoxicated and it should not be taken for at least 12 hours after drinking alcohol. Unpleasant side effects (nausea, headache, vomiting, chest pains, difficulty breathing) can occur as soon as ten minutes after drinking even a small amount of alcohol and can last for an hour or more.
  • Naltrexone – blocks the euphoric effects and feelings of intoxication and allows people with alcohol use disorders to reduce alcohol use and to remain motivated to continue to take the medication, stay in treatment, and avoid relapses.

To learn more about MAT for alcohol use disorders view Medication for the Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder: A Brief Guide – 2015 and TIP 49: Incorporating Alcohol Pharmacotherapies Into Medical Practice.

Opioid Dependency Medications – Buprenorphine, methadone, and naltrexone are used to treat opioid use disorders to short-acting opioids such as heroin, morphine, and codeine, as well as semi-synthetic opioids like oxycodone and hydrocodone. These MAT medications are safe to use for months, years, or even a lifetime. As with any medication, consult your doctor before discontinuing use.

  • Buprenorphine – suppresses and reduces cravings for opioids. Learn more about buprenorphine.
  • Methadone – reduces opioid cravings and withdrawal and blunts or blocks the effects of opioids. Learn more about methadone.
  • Naltrexone – blocks the euphoric and sedative effects of opioids and prevents feelings of euphoria. Learn more about naltrexone.

Learn more about MAT for opioid use disorders or download TIP 63: Medications for Opioid Use Disorder – Introduction to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (Part 1 of 5) – 2020.

Opioid Overdose Prevention Medication – Naloxone saves lives by reversing the toxic effects of overdose. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), naloxone is one of a number of medications considered essential to a functioning health care system.

  • Naloxone – used to prevent opioid overdose, naloxone reverses the toxic effects of the overdose. Learn more about Naloxone.

Counseling and Behavioral Therapies

Under federal law 42.CFR 8.12, MAT patients receiving treatment in OTPs must receive counseling, which may include different forms of behavioral therapy. These services are required along with medical, vocational, educational, and other assessment and treatment services. 

Regardless of what setting MAT is provided in, it is more effective when counseling and other behavioral health therapies are included to provide patients with a whole-person approach.

Co-Occurring Disorders and Other Health Conditions

The coexistence of both a substance use disorder and a mental illness, known as a co-occurring disorder, is common among people in MAT. In addition, individuals may have other health-related conditions such as hepatitis, HIV and AIDS. 

 


Case Management in Addiction

Case management is a coordinated, intentional approach to delivering quality services (SAMHSA, 2015). It requires cooperation among multiple agencies and professionals, awareness of the multifaceted needs of clients, and purposeful collaboration between counselor and client.

In many ways, all addiction professionals take on the role of case manager. This includes doctors, nurses, social workers, licensed counselors, and certified addictions counselors. The reason for this distinction is because of the range of “whole-person” issues discussed throughout this book. Substance use disorder is a primary diagnosis, but it is not an isolated one.

SAMHSA developed a series of treatment improvement protocol manuals (TIPs) designed to provide professionals with expert guidance, and they devoted an entire manual to the importance of case management services (TIP 27). Included in the manual is an overview of the skills that case managers in substance abuse treatment settings need to have:

  • Understanding various models and theories of addiction and other problems related to substance abuse
  • Ability to describe the philosophies, practices, policies, and outcomes of the most generally accepted and scientifically supported models of treatment, recovery, relapse prevention, and continuing care for addiction and other substance-related problems
  • Ability to recognize the importance of family, social networks, community systems, and self-help groups in the treatment and recovery process
  • Understanding the variety of insurance and health maintenance options available and the importance of helping clients access those benefits
  • Understanding diverse cultures and incorporating the relevant needs of culturally diverse groups, as well as people with disabilities, into clinical practice
  • Understanding the value of an interdisciplinary approach to addiction treatment

 


Assessment & Treatment Quiz


Screening and Assessment Tools Chart

Tool Substance type Patient age How tool is administered
Alcohol Drugs Adults Adolescents Self-
administered
Clinician-
administered
Screens
Screening to Brief Intervention (S2BI) X X X X X
Brief Screener for Alcohol, Tobacco, and other Drugs (BSTAD) X X X X X
Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription medication, and other Substance use (TAPS) X X X X X
NIDA Drug Use Screening Tool: Quick Screen (NMASSIST) X X X X
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-C (AUDIT-C) X X X X
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) X X X
Opioid Risk Tool X X X
CAGE-AID X X X X
CAGE X X X
Helping Patients Who Drink Too Much: A Clinician’s Guide (NIAAA) X X X
Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention for Youth: A Practitioner’s Guide (NIAAA) X X X
Assessments
Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription medication, and other Substance use (TAPS) X X X X X
CRAFFT X X X X X
Drug Abuse Screen Test (DAST-10)* X X X X
Drug Abuse Screen Test (DAST-20: Adolescent version)* X X X X
NIDA Drug Use Screening Tool (NMASSIST) X X X X
Helping Patients Who Drink Too Much: A Clinician’s Guide (NIAAA) X X X
Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention for Youth: A Practitioner’s Guide (NIAAA) X X X

DSM-5 Criteria for Substance Use Disorder

  1. The substance is often taken in larger amounts or over a longer period than was intended.
  2. There is a persistent desire or unsuccessful effort to cut down or control use of the substance.
  3. A great deal of time is spent in activities necessary to obtain the substance, use the substance, or recover from its effects.
  4. Craving, or a strong desire or urge to use the substance, occurs.
  5. Recurrent use of the substance results in a failure to fulfill major role obligations at work, school, or home.
  6. Use of the substance continues despite having persistent or recurrent social or interpersonal problems caused or exacerbated by the effects of its use.
  7. Important social, occupational, or recreational activities are given up or reduced because of use of the substance.
  8. Use of the substance is recurrent in situations in which it is physically hazardous.
  9. Use of the substance is continued despite knowledge of having a persistent or recurrent physical or psychological problem that is likely to have been caused or exacerbated by the substance.
  10. Tolerance, as defined by either of the following:
    1. A need for markedly increased amounts of the substance to achieve intoxication or desired effect
    2. A markedly diminished effect with continued use of the same amount of the substance.
  11. Withdrawal, as manifested by either of the following:
    1. The characteristic withdrawal syndrome for that substance (as specified in the DSM-5 for each substance).
    2. The use of a substance (or a closely related substance) to relieve or avoid withdrawal symptoms.

Screening and Assessment Tools Chart

Screening tools

Tool Substance type Patient age How tool is administered
Alcohol Drugs Adults Adolescents Self-
administered
Clinician-
administered
Screening to Brief Intervention (S2BI) X X X X X
Brief Screener for Alcohol, Tobacco, and other Drugs (BSTAD) X X X X X
Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription medication, and other Substance use (TAPS) X X X X X
Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention for Youth: A Practitioner’s Guide (NIAAA) X X X
Opioid Risk Tool – OUD (ORT-OUD) Chart X X X

Assessment Resources

Tool Substance type Patient age How tool is administered
Alcohol Drugs Adults Adolescents Self-
administered
Clinician-
administered
Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription medication, and other Substance use (TAPS) X X X X X
CRAFFT X X X X X
Drug Abuse Screen Test (DAST-10)* X X X X
Drug Abuse Screen Test (DAST-20: Adolescent version)* X X X X
NIDA Drug Use Screening Tool (NMASSIST) (discontinued in favor of TAPS screening above) X X X X
Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention for Youth: A Practitioner’s Guide (NIAAA) X X X

MHSA’s Concept of Trauma and Guidance for a Trauma-Informed Approach

The convergence of the trauma survivor’s perspective with research and clinical work has underscored the central role of traumatic experiences in the lives of people with mental and substance use conditions. The connection between trauma and these conditions offers a potential explanatory model for what has happened to individuals, both children and adults, who come to the attention of the behavioral health and other service systems.

People with traumatic experiences, however, do not show up only in behavioral health systems. Responses to these experiences often manifest in behaviors or conditions that result in involvement with the child welfare and the criminal and juvenile justice system or in difficulties in the education, employment, or primary care system. Recently, there has also been a focus on individuals in the military and increasing rates of post-traumatic stress disorder.

SAMHSA’s Definition of Trauma

Individual trauma results from an event, series of events, or set of circumstances that is experienced by an individual as physically or emotionally harmful or life-threatening and that has lasting adverse effects on the individual’s functioning and mental, physical, social, emotional, or spiritual well-being.

The six key principles fundamental to a trauma-informed approach include:

1. Safety

Throughout the organization, staff and the people they serve, whether children or adults, feel physically and psychologically safe; the physical setting is safe and interpersonal interactions promote a sense of safety. Understanding safety as defined by those served is a high priority.

2. Trustworthiness and Transparency

Organizational operations and decisions are conducted with transparency with the goal of building and maintaining trust with clients and family members, among staff, and others involved in the organization.

3. Peer Support

Peer support and mutual self-help are key vehicles for establishing safety and hope, building trust, enhancing collaboration, and utilizing stories and lived experiences to promote recovery and healing. The term peers refers to individuals with lived experiences of trauma. In the case of children, these may be members of their family who have experienced traumatic events and are key caregivers in their recovery. Peers have also been referred to as trauma survivors.

4. Collaboration and Mutuality

Importance is placed on partnering and the leveling of power differences between staff and clients and among organizational staff from clerical and housekeeping personnel, to professional staff to administrators, demonstrating that healing happens in relationships and in the meaningful sharing of power and decision-making. The organization recognizes that everyone has a role to play in a trauma-informed approach. As one expert stated, “one does not have to be a therapist to be therapeutic.”

5. Empowerment, Voice and Choice

Throughout the organization and among the clients served, individuals’ strengths and experiences are recognized and built upon. The organization fosters a belief in the primacy of the people served; in resilience; and in the ability of individuals, organizations, and communities to heal and promote recovery from trauma. The organization understands that the experience of trauma may be a unifying aspect in the lives of those who run the organization, who provide the services, and/ or who come to the organization for assistance and support. As such, operations, workforce development, and services are organized to foster empowerment for staff and clients alike. Organizations understand the importance of power differentials and ways in which clients, historically, have been diminished in voice and choice and are often recipients of coercive treatment. Clients are supported in shared decision-making, choice, and goal setting to determine the plan of action they need to heal and move forward. They are supported in cultivating self-advocacy skills. Staff are facilitators of recovery rather than controllers of recovery. Staff are empowered to do their work as well as possible by adequate organizational support. This is a parallel process as staff need to feel safe, as much as people receiving services.

6. Cultural, Historical, and Gender Issues

The organization actively moves past cultural stereotypes and biases (based on race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, age, religion, gender-identity, geography, etc.); offers access to gender-responsive services; leverages the healing value of traditional cultural connections; incorporates policies, protocols, and processes that are responsive to the racial, ethnic and cultural needs of individuals served; and recognizes and addresses historical trauma.


The Trauma-Addiction Connection

When a person fears for his/her safety, experiences intense pain, or witnesses a tragic or violent act, that person can be described as having experienced trauma. Levels of resiliency vary from person to person, so reactions to traumatic events are similarly varied. Although frightening experiences impact people at any age, adults will generally be more likely to manage through trauma than children will be. Further, some trauma is repeated or ongoing, such as that of child abuse or military combat. Other examples of traumatic events include car accidents, repeated bullying, street violence, sexual assault, domestic violence, growing up in an unstable home, natural disasters, or battling a life-threatening condition.

If trauma and the feelings associated with it are not resolved, serious long-term issues can develop. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) disrupts the lives of people who have experienced unresolved trauma by negatively impacting their relationships, emotions, physical body, thinking and behavior. PTSD sufferers may experience sleep disturbances, nightmares, anxiety and depression, flashbacks, dissociative episodes in which they feel disconnected from reality, excessive fears, self-injurious behaviors, impulsivity and addictive traits.

Researchers have been studying the connection between trauma and addiction in order to understand why so many drug and alcohol abusers have histories of traumatic experiences. Data from over 17,000 patients in Kaiser Permanente’s Adverse Childhood Experiences study indicate that a child who experiences four or more traumatic events is five times more likely to become an alcoholic, 60% more likely to become obese, and up to 46 times more likely to become an injection-drug user than the general population.  Other studies have found similar connections between childhood trauma and addiction, and studies by the Veterans Administration have led to estimates that between 35-75% of veterans with PTSD abuse drugs and alcohol.

The reasons behind this common co-occurrence of addiction and trauma are complex. For one thing, some people struggling to manage the effects of trauma in their lives may turn to drugs and alcohol to self-medicate. Post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms like agitation, hypersensitivity to loud noises or sudden movements, depression, social withdrawal and insomnia may seem more manageable through the use of sedating or stimulating drugs depending on the symptom. However, addiction soon becomes yet another problem in the trauma survivor’s life. Before long, the “cure” no longer works, and it causes far more pain to an already suffering person.

Other possible reasons addiction and trauma are often found together include the theory that a substance abuser’s lifestyle puts him/her in harm’s way more often than that of a non-addicted person. Unsavory acquaintances, dangerous neighborhoods, impaired driving, and other aspects commonly associated with drug and alcohol abuse may indeed predispose substance abusers to being traumatized by crime, accidents, violence and abuse. There may also be a genetic component linking people prone toward PTSD and those with addictive tendencies, although no definitive conclusion has been made by research so far.

First Things First

Sometimes, years of self-medicating through drugs and alcohol have effectively dulled the memory of trauma, so the only problem seems to be substance abuse and addiction. A person who has suppressed or ignored traumatic experiences may work very hard to get and stay sober, only to find other addictive behaviors eventually replacing the drugs and alcohol. These might include compulsive overeating, gambling, sexual promiscuity or any other compulsion-driven behavior. Unfortunately, continuing to avoid resolution of trauma will almost guarantee ongoing suffering.

However, dealing with traumatic experiences is challenging work. Under the influence of drugs and alcohol, it is a nearly impossible task. That is why therapists always recommend working first on recovery from drug addiction and alcoholism. Then, when the trauma survivor is stronger and more clear-minded, s/he can begin working with a therapist in individual or group counseling to address the underlying problem of unresolved trauma. Specific treatment modalities have been developed for people suffering long-term effects after traumatic experiences, including trauma-focused therapies, PTSD Intervention, Body Psychotherapy which targets the physiological response to trauma, and medications for depression and anxiety.

Considering the frequent link between trauma and addiction, anyone working on recovery from substance abuse and addiction could benefit from an assessment by a skilled therapist, to determine if there are underlying issues that should be addressed and to devise an appropriate treatment plan. The best approach is always to work first on living a sober life, then on resolving past trauma and learning positive coping skills, thereby breaking the trauma-addiction connection and finding a better life all around.

Hackensack Meridian Carrier Clinic. (2019). Trauma and addiction. Retrieved from https://carrierclinic.org/2019/08/06/trauma-and-addiction/

For more information, visit carrierclinic.org


The following video, produced by the Carrier Clinic, highlights the significant link between post-traumatic stress disorder and addiction.

 


The following video examines the ways trauma and addiction are linked. The issue of trauma has become one of the most important concepts in the treatment of addiction.

 

References

  1. American  Psychiatric  Association.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA.
  2. Davenport-Hines, R. The Pursuit of Oblivion: A Global History of Narcotics; WW Norton & Company: New York, NY, USA, 2003.
  3. Booth, M. Opium : A History; St. Martin’s Griffin: New York, NY, USA, 1999.
  4. Hanson, D. Historical Evolution of Alcohol Consumption in Society; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2013.
  5. Earleywine, M. Understanding Marijuana: A New Look at the Scientific Evidence; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2002.
  6. Sournia, J.C. A History of Alcoholism; Blackwell: London, UK, 1990.
  7. Grinspoon, L.; Bakalar, J.B. Marihuana, the Forbidden Medicine; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 1997.
  8. White, W.L. Slaying the Dragon: The History of Addiction Treatment and Recovery in America; Chestnut Health Systems/Lighthouse Institute: Bloomington, IL, USA, 1998.
  9. Lee, M.A. Smoke Signals: A Social History of Marijuana—Medical, Recreational and Scientific; Scribner: New York, NY, USA, 2013.
  10. Berridge, V. Victorian Opium Eating: Responses to Opiate Use in Nineteenth-Century England. Vic. Stud. 1978, 21, 437–461. [PubMed]
  11. Shorter, E. The History of Nosology and the Rise of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 2015, 17, 59–67. [PubMed]
  12. Keller, M.; Doria, J. On Defining Alcoholism. Alcohol Health Res. World 1991, 15, 253–259.
  13. Markel, H. Über Coca: Sigmund Freud, Carl Koller, and Cocaine. JAMA 2011, 305, 1360–1361. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual: Mental Disorders, 1st ed.; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1952.
  15. Jellinek, E.M. The Disease Concept of Alcoholism; Hillhouse Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 1960.
  16. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 2nd ed.; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1968.
  17. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd rev. ed.; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1987.
  18. Howlett,  A.C.;  Bidaut-Russell,  M.;  Devane,  W.A.;  Melvin,   L.S.;   Johnson,   M.R.;   Herkenham,   M. The Cannabinoid Receptor: Biochemical, Anatomical and Behavioral Characterization. Trends Neurosci. 1990, 13, 420–423. [CrossRef]
  19. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed.; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1994.
  20. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,  Fourth Edition,  Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR); American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
  21. U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDA/HHS). Report of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee on the Dietary Guidelines for Americans; USDA, Agricultural Research Service: Washington, DC, USA, 2010.
  22. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM–5), 5th ed.; American Psychiatric Publishing: Washington, DC, USA, 2013.

National Conference of State Legislatures. State Medical Marijuana Laws. Available online: State Medical Marijuana Laws

Abel, E.L. Marihuana, the First Twelve Thousand Years; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1980.

Carter, T.F. The Invention of Printing in China and Its Spread Westward; Ronald Press: New York, NY, USA, 1955.

Kunisaki, J. A Handy Guide to Papermaking; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1948.

Karch, S.B. A Brief History of Cocaine; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005.

Levy,  J.V.;  Freye, E. Pharmacology and Abuse of Cocaine, Amphetamines, Ecstasy and Related Designer Drugs:  A Comprehensive Review on Their Mode of Action, Treatment of Abuse and Intoxication; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009.

Long, H.; Greller, H.; Mercurio-Zappala, M.; Nelson, L.S.; Hoffman, R.S. Medicinal Use of Cocaine: A Shifting Paradigm over 25 Years. Laryngoscope 2004, 114, 1625–1629. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Merrill, J.L. The Bible and the American Temperance Movement: Text, Context, and Pretext. Harv. Theol. Rev. 1988, 81, 145–170. [CrossRef]

31.       Alcoholics Anonymous. Alcoholics Anonymous: The Story of How Many Thousands of Men and Women Have Recovered from Alcoholism, 4th ed.; Alcoholics Anonymous World Services: New York, NY, USA, 2001.

32.       Silkworth, W.D. The Doctor’s Opinion. Available online: http://www.step12.com/silkworthdoctors-opinion. html

33.       Alcoholics Anonymous General Service Office. Estimates of A.A. Groups and Members as of January 1, 2015.

34.       Maines, R. The Technology of Orgasm: “Hysteria,” the Vibrator, and Women’s Sexual Satisfaction; American Council of Learned Societies: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2001.

35.       Yorke, C. A Critical Review of Some Psychoanalytic Literature on Drug Addiction. Br. J. Med. Psychol. 197043, 141–159. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

36.       Independence Hall Association. Economic Growth and the Early Industrial Revolution. Available online: http://www.ushistory.org (accessed on 21 March 2016).

37.       Provine, D.M. Unequal under Law: Race in the War on Drugs; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL,  USA, 2008.

38.       Fields, H.L. The Doctor’s Dilemma: Opiate Analgesics and Chronic Pain. Neuron 2011, 69, 591–594. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

39.       Rosenblum, A.; Marsch, L.A.; Joseph, H.; Portenoy, R.K. Opioids and the Treatment of Chronic Pain: Controversies, Current Status, and Future Directions. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2008, 16, 405–416. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

40.       Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prescription Painkiller Overdoses in the U.S.; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2011.

41.       National Institute on Drug Abuse. Trends & Statistics; National Institute on Drug Abuse: North Bethesda, MD, USA, 2014.

42.       Thompson, A.E. Medical Marijuana. JAMA 2015, 313, 2508. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

43.       Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Behavioral Health Trends in the United States: Results from the 2014 National Survey on Drug Use and Health; Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration: Rockville, MD, USA, 2015.

44.       Grabowski, J. NIDA Research Monographs 50, Cocaine:  Pharmacology,  Effects,  and  Treatment  of  Abuse; Diane Publishing Co: Darby, PA, USA, 1994.

45.       U.S. Department of Justice. List of Controlled Substances. Drug Enforcement Administration. Available online: http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/schedules (accessed on 15 December 2015).

46.       World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014.

47.       Wilson, M. DSM-III and the Transformation of American Psychiatry: A History. Am. J. Psychiatry 1993, 150, 399–410. [PubMed]

48.       Paris, J.; Phillips, J. Making the DSM-5: Concepts and Controversies; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013.

49.   American Medical Association. AMA History Timeline. Available online: AMA History

50.       Feighner, J.P.; Robins, E.; Guze, S.B.; Woodruff, R.A., Jr.; Winokur, G.; Munoz, R. Diagnostic Criteria for Use in Psychiatric Research. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1972, 26, 57–63. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

51.  Spitzer, R.L.; Williams, J.B.; Skodol, A.E. DSM-III: The Major Achievements and an Overview. Am. J. Psychiatry. 1980, 137, 151–164. [PubMed]

52. Rounsaville, B.J.; Spitzer, R.L.; Williams, J.B. Proposed Changes in DSM-III Substance Use Disorders: Description and Rationale. Am. J. Psychiatry 1986, 143, 463–468. [PubMed]

53. Widiger, T.A.; Smith, G.T. Addiction and Nosology. In Apa Addiction Syndrome Handbook, Vol. 1: Foundations, Influences, and Expressions of Addiction; Shaffer, H.J., LaPlante, D.A., Nelson, S.E., Shaffer, H.J., LaPlante, D.A., Nelson, S.E., Eds.; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2012; pp. 49–66.

54. Edwards, G. The Alcohol Dependence Syndrome: A Concept as Stimulus to Enquiry. Br. J. Addict. 1986, 81, 171–183. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

55. Wakefield, J.C. DSM-5 Substance Use Disorder: How Conceptual Missteps Weakened the Foundations of the Addictive Disorders Field. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2015, 132, 327–334. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

56. Beckson, M.; Tucker, D. Commentary: Craving Diagnostic Validity in DSM-5 Substance Use Disorders. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 2014, 42, 453–458. [PubMed]

57. Hasin, D.S.; Fenton, M.C.; Beseler, C.; Park, J.Y.; Wall, M.M. Analyses Related to the Development of DSM-5 Criteria for Substance Use Related Disorders: 2. Proposed DSM-5 Criteria for Alcohol, Cannabis, Cocaine and Heroin Disorders in 663 Substance Abuse Patients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012, 122, 28–37. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

58. Brown, T.A.; Barlow, D.H. Dimensional Versus Categorical Classification of  Mental  Disorders  in  the Fifth Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and Beyond:  Comment on the Special Section. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 2005, 114, 551–556. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

59. Krueger, R.F. The Structure of Common Mental Disorders. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1999, 56, 921–926. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

60. Widiger, T.A.; Simonsen, E. Alternative Dimensional Models of Personality Disorder: Finding a Common Ground. J. Personal. Disord. 2005, 19, 110–130. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

61. First, M.B.; Bhat, V.; Adler, D.; Dixon, L.; Goldman, B.; Koh, S.; Levine, B.; Oslin, D.; Siris, S. How Do Clinicians Actually Use the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders in Clinical Practice and Why We Need to Know More. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 2014, 202, 841–844. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

62. Kim, N.S.; Ahn, W.-K. Clinical Psychologists’ Theory-Based Representations of Mental Disorders Predict Their Diagnostic Reasoning and Memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2002, 131, 451–476. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

63. Sobell, L.C.; Ellingstad, T.P.; Sobell, M.B. Natural Recovery from Alcohol and Drug Problems: Methodological Review of the Research with Suggestions for Future Directions. Addiction 2000, 95, 749–764. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

64. Sobell, M.B.; Sobell, L.C. Controlled Drinking after 25 Years: How Important Was the Great Debate? Addiction 1995, 90, 1149–1153. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

65. Sobell, M.B.; Sobell, L.C. Moderation, Public Health and Paternalism. Addiction 1995, 90, 1175–1177. [CrossRef]

66.  Volkow, N.D.; Koob, G. Brain Disease Model of Addiction: Why Is It So Controversial? Lancet Psychiatry 2015, 2, 677–679. [CrossRef]

67.  Hall, W.; Carter, A.; Forlini, C. The Brain Disease Model of Addiction: Is It Supported by the Evidence and Has It Delivered on Its Promises? Lancet Psychiatry 2015, 2, 105–110. [CrossRef]

68. Heyman, G.M. Addiction: A Disorder of Choice; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009.

69. Beutler, L.E.; Williams, R.E.; Wakefield, P.J.; Entwistle, S.R. Bridging Scientist and Practitioner Perspectives in Clinical Psychology. Am. Psychol. 1995, 50, 984–994. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

70. Fox, R.E. Charlatanism, Scientism, and Psychology’s Social Contract. 103rd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association: Presidential Address (1995, New York, New York). Am. Psychol. 1996, 51, 777–784. [CrossRef]

71.  Lilienfeld, S.O. Can Psychology Become a Science? Personal. Individ. Differ. 2010, 49, 281–288. [CrossRef]

72. Stewart, R.E.; Chambless, D.L.; Baron, J. Theoretical and Practical Barriers to Practitioners’ Willingness to Seek Training in Empirically Supported Treatments. J. Clin. Psychol. 2012, 68, 8–23. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

73. Barlow, D.H.; Levitt, J.T.; Bufka, L.F. The Dissemination of Empirically Supported Treatments: A View to the Future. Behav. Res. Ther. 1999, 37, S147–S162. [CrossRef]

74.  Forman, R.F.; Bovasso, G.; Woody, G. Staff Beliefs About Addiction Treatment. J. Subst. Abus. Treat. 2001, 21, 1–9. [CrossRef]

75. Herbeck, D.M.; Hser,  Y.-I.;  Teruya,  C. Empirically Supported Substance Abuse Treatment Approaches: A Survey of Treatment Providers’ Perspectives and Practices. Addict. Behav. 2008, 33, 699–712. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

76. Willenbring, M.L.; Kivlahan, D.; Kenny, M.; Grillo, M.; Hagedorn, H.; Postier, A. Beliefs About Evidence-Based Practices in Addiction Treatment: A Survey of Veterans Administration Program Leaders. J. Subst. Abus. Treat. 2004, 26, 79–85. [CrossRef]

77. Mark, T.L.; Kassed, C.A.; Vandivort-Warren, R.; Levit, K.R.; Kranzler, H.R. Alcohol and Opioid Dependence Medications: Prescription Trends, Overall and by Physician Specialty. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009, 99, 345–349. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

78. Knudsen, H.K.; Ducharme, L.J.; Roman, P.M. The Adoption of Medications in Substance Abuse Treatment: Associations with Organizational Characteristics and Technology Clusters. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007, 87, 164–174. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

79. Johnson, R.A.; Lukens, J.M.; Kole, J.W.; Sisti, D.A. Views About Responsibility for Alcohol Addiction and Negative Evaluations of Naltrexone. Subst. Abus. Treat. Prev. Policy 2015, 10, 1–13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

80. Rubinsky, A.D.; Chen, C.; Batki, S.L.; Williams, E.C.; Harris, A.H. Comparative Utilization of Pharmacotherapy for Alcohol Use Disorder and Other Psychiatric Disorders among US Veterans Health Administration Patients with Dual Diagnoses. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2015, 69, 150–157.

81. Compton, W.M.; Saha, T.D.; Conway, K.P.; Grant, B.F. The Role of Cannabis Use within a Dimensional Approach to Cannabis Use Disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009, 100, 221–227.

82. Saha, T.D.; Chou, S.P.; Grant, B.F. Toward an Alcohol Use Disorder Continuum Using Item Response Theory: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Psychol. Med. 2006, 36, 931–941.

83. Shmulewitz, D.; Keyes, K.; Beseler, C.; Aharonovich, E.; Aivadyan, C.; Spivak, B.; Hasin, D. The Dimensionality of Alcohol Use Disorders: Results from Israel. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010, 111, 146–154.

84. Gelhorn, H.; Hartman, C.; Sakai, J.; Stallings, M.; Young, S.; Rhee, S.H.; Corley, R.; Hewitt, J.; Hopfer, C.; Crowley, T. Toward Dsm-V: An Item Response Theory Analysis of the Diagnostic Process for DSM-IV Alcohol Abuse and Dependence in Adolescents. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2008, 47, 1329–1339.

85. Fischer, B.A. A Review of American Psychiatry through Its Diagnoses: The History and Development of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 2012, 200, 1022–1030.

86. Spitzer, R.L. The Diagnostic Status of Homosexuality in DSM-III: A Reformulation of the Issues. Am. J. Psychiatry 1981, 138, 210–215.

87. American Psychiatric Association. Homosexuality and Sexuality Orientation Disturbance: Proposed Change in DSM-II, 6th Printing, Page 44; No. 730008; American Psychiatric Association: Arlington, VA, USA, 1973.

88.  Babor, T. Drug Policy and the Public Good; Oxford University Press: Oxford, NY, USA, 2010.

89. Kurtzleben, D. Data Show Racial Disparity in Crack Sentencing. US News & World  Report,  2010.  Available online: http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2010/08/03/data-show-racial-disparity-in- crack-sentencing (accessed on 8 March 2016).

90.  Nutt, D.J.; King, L.A.; Phillips, L.D. Drug Harms in the UK: A Multicriteria Decision Analysis. Lancet  2010376, 1558–1565.

91.  Van Amsterdam, J.; Opperhuizen, A.; Koeter, M.; Van Den Brink, W. Ranking the Harm of Alcohol, Tobacco and Illicit Drugs for the Individual and the Population. Eur. Addict. Res. 2010, 16, 202–207.

92. Weissenborn, R.; Nutt, D.J. Popular Intoxicants: What Lessons Can Be Learned from the Last 40 Years of Alcohol and Cannabis Regulation? J. Psychopharmacol. 2012, 26, 213–220.

93.   Borges, G.; Ye, Y.; Bond, J.; Cherpitel, C.J.; Cremonte, M.; Moskalewicz, J.; Swiatkiewicz, G.; Rubio-Stipec, M. The Dimensionality of Alcohol Use Disorders and Alcohol Consumption in a Cross-National Perspective. Addiction 2010, 105, 240–254.

94. Harford, T.C.; Yi, H.Y.; Faden, V.B.; Chen, C.M. The Dimensionality of DSM-IV Alcohol Use Disorders among Adolescent and Adult Drinkers and Symptom Patterns by Age, Gender, and Race/Ethnicity. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2009, 33, 868–878.

Hasin, D.S.; Beseler, C.L. Dimensionality of Lifetime Alcohol Abuse, Dependence and Binge Drinking. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009, 101, 53–61. 

95. Keyes, K.M.; Hasin, D.S. Socio-Economic Status and Problem Alcohol Use: The Positive Relationship between Income and the DSM-IV Alcohol Abuse Diagnosis. Addiction 2008, 103, 1120–1130. 

96. Babor, T.F.; Caetano, R. The Trouble with Alcohol Abuse: What Are We Trying to Measure, Diagnose, Count and Prevent? Addiction 2008, 103, 1057–1059. 

97. Hasin, D.; Paykin, A.; Endicott, J.; Grant, B. The Validity of DSM-IV Alcohol Abuse: Drunk Drivers Versus All Others. J. Stud. Alcohol. 1999, 60, 746–755.

98. Szasz, T.S. The Myth of Mental Illness. Am. Psychol. 1960, 15, 113–118.

Kendler, K.S.; Gardner, C.O., Jr. Boundaries of Major Depression: An Evaluation of DSM-IV Criteria. Am. J. Psychiatry 1998, 155, 172–177. 

Najman, J.M. Commentary on Wakefield & Schmitz (2015): Diagnosing an Alcohol Use Disorder—What Criteria Should Be Used? Addiction 2015, 110, 943–944.

Norko, M.A.; Fitch, W.L. ‘DSM-5 and Substance Use Disorders’: Reply. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 2015, 43, 263–264.

Haass-Koffler, C.L.; Leggio, L.; Kenna, G.A. Pharmacological Approaches to Reducing Craving in Patients with Alcohol Use Disorders. CNS Drugs 2014, 28, 343–360.]

Robinson, T.E.; Berridge, K.C. The Neural Basis of Drug Craving: An Incentive-Sensitization Theory of Addiction. Brain Res. Rev. 1993, 18, 247–291.

Blaszczynski, A. Commentary On: Are We Overpathologizing Everyday Life? A Tenable Blueprint for Behavioral Addiction Research. J. Behav. Addict. 2015, 4, 142–144.

Frances, A.J.   DSM-5   Suggests   Opening   the   Door   to  Behavioral  Addictions.  Available online: Behavioral Addictions

Frances, A.J.; Widiger, T.A. Psychiatric Diagnosis: Lessons from the DSM-IV Past and Cautions for the DSM-5 Future. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 2012, 8, 109–130.

Kawa, S.; Giordano, J. A Brief Historicity of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: Issues and Implications for the Future of Psychiatric Canon and Practice. Philos. Ethics Humanit. Med. 2012, 7, 2.

Insel, T.; Cuthbert, B.; Garvey, M.; Heinssen, R.; Pine, D.S.; Quinn, K.; Sanislow, C.; Wang, P. Research Domain Criteria (Rdoc): Toward a New Classification Framework for Research on Mental Disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 2010, 167, 748–751.

Goldfried, M.R. On Possible Consequences of National Institute of Mental Health Funding for Psychotherapy Research and Training. Prof. Psychol. Res. Pract. 2016, 47, 77–83.

Schutz, C.G. DSM-V, RDoC and Diagnostic Approaches in Addiction Research and Therapy. J. Addict. Res. Ther. 2012.

Moreno-López, L.; Catena, A.; Fernández-Serrano, M.J.; Delgado-Rico, E.; Stamatakis, E.A.; Pérez-García, M.; Verdejo-García, A. Trait Impulsivity and Prefrontal Gray Matter Reductions in Cocaine Dependent Individuals. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012, 125, 208–214.

Stevens, L.; Verdejo-García, A.; Goudriaan, A.E.; Roeyers, H.; Dom, G.; Vanderplasschen, W. Impulsivity as a Vulnerability Factor for Poor Addiction Treatment Outcomes: A Review of Neurocognitive Findings among Individuals with Substance Use Disorders. J. Subst. Abus. Treat. 2014, 47, 58–72.

Wilcox, C.E.; Pommy, J.M.; Adinoff, B. Neural Circuitry of Impaired Emotion Regulation in Substance Use Disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 2016, 173, 344–361.

Toyokawa, S.; Uddin, M.; Koenen, K.C.; Galea, S. How Does the Social Environment ‘Get into the Mind’? Epigenetics at the Intersection of Social and Psychiatric Epidemiology. Soc. Sci. Med. 2012, 74, 67–74.

 

definition

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Foundations of Addiction Studies Copyright © by Jason Florin and Julie Trytek is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.