MAT Medications
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved several different medications to treat alcohol and opioid use disorders MAT medications relieve the withdrawal symptoms and psychological cravings that cause chemical imbalances in the body. Medications used for MAT are evidence-based treatment options and do not just substitute one drug for another.
Methadone used to treat those with a confirmed diagnosis of Opioid Use Disorder can only be dispensed through a SAMHSA certified OTP. Some of the medications used in MAT are controlled substances due to their potential for misuse. Drugs, substances, and certain chemicals used to make drugs are classified by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) into five distinct categories, or schedules, depending upon a drug’s acceptable medical use and potential for misuse. Learn more about DEA drug schedules.
Alcohol Use Disorder Medications – Acamprosate, disulfiram, and naltrexone are the most common drugs used to treat alcohol use disorder. They do not provide a cure for the disorder but are most effective in people who participate in a MAT program.
- Acamprosate – is for people in recovery, who are no longer drinking alcohol and want to avoid drinking. It works to prevent people from drinking alcohol, but it does not prevent withdrawal symptoms after people drink alcohol. It has not been shown to work in people who continue drinking alcohol, consume illicit drugs, and/or engage in prescription drug misuse and abuse. The use of acamprosate typically begins on the fifth day of abstinence, reaching full effectiveness in five to eight days. It is offered in tablet form and taken three times a day, preferably at the same time every day. The medication’s side effects may include diarrhea, upset stomach, appetite loss, anxiety, dizziness, and difficulty sleeping.
- Disulfiram – treats chronic alcoholism and is most effective in people who have already gone through detoxification or are in the initial stage of abstinence. Offered in a tablet form and taken once a day, disulfiram should never be taken while intoxicated and it should not be taken for at least 12 hours after drinking alcohol. Unpleasant side effects (nausea, headache, vomiting, chest pains, difficulty breathing) can occur as soon as ten minutes after drinking even a small amount of alcohol and can last for an hour or more.
- Naltrexone – blocks the euphoric effects and feelings of intoxication and allows people with alcohol use disorders to reduce alcohol use and to remain motivated to continue to take the medication, stay in treatment, and avoid relapses.
To learn more about MAT for alcohol use disorders view Medication for the Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder: A Brief Guide – 2015 and TIP 49: Incorporating Alcohol Pharmacotherapies Into Medical Practice.
Opioid Dependency Medications – Buprenorphine, methadone, and naltrexone are used to treat opioid use disorders to short-acting opioids such as heroin, morphine, and codeine, as well as semi-synthetic opioids like oxycodone and hydrocodone. These MAT medications are safe to use for months, years, or even a lifetime. As with any medication, consult your doctor before discontinuing use.
- Buprenorphine – suppresses and reduces cravings for opioids. Learn more about buprenorphine.
- Methadone – reduces opioid cravings and withdrawal and blunts or blocks the effects of opioids. Learn more about methadone.
- Naltrexone – blocks the euphoric and sedative effects of opioids and prevents feelings of euphoria. Learn more about naltrexone.
Learn more about MAT for opioid use disorders or download TIP 63: Medications for Opioid Use Disorder – Introduction to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (Part 1 of 5) – 2020.
Opioid Overdose Prevention Medication – Naloxone saves lives by reversing the toxic effects of overdose. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), naloxone is one of a number of medications considered essential to a functioning health care system.
- Naloxone – used to prevent opioid overdose, naloxone reverses the toxic effects of the overdose. Learn more about Naloxone.
Counseling and Behavioral Therapies
Under federal law 42.CFR 8.12, MAT patients receiving treatment in OTPs must receive counseling, which may include different forms of behavioral therapy. These services are required along with medical, vocational, educational, and other assessment and treatment services.
Regardless of what setting MAT is provided in, it is more effective when counseling and other behavioral health therapies are included to provide patients with a whole-person approach.
Co-Occurring Disorders and Other Health Conditions
The coexistence of both a substance use disorder and a mental illness, known as a co-occurring disorder, is common among people in MAT. In addition, individuals may have other health-related conditions such as hepatitis, HIV and AIDS.
Case Management in Addiction
Case management is a coordinated, intentional approach to delivering quality services (SAMHSA, 2015). It requires cooperation among multiple agencies and professionals, awareness of the multifaceted needs of clients, and purposeful collaboration between counselor and client.
In many ways, all addiction professionals take on the role of case manager. This includes doctors, nurses, social workers, licensed counselors, and certified addictions counselors. The reason for this distinction is because of the range of “whole-person” issues discussed throughout this book. Substance use disorder is a primary diagnosis, but it is not an isolated one.
SAMHSA developed a series of treatment improvement protocol manuals (TIPs) designed to provide professionals with expert guidance, and they devoted an entire manual to the importance of case management services (TIP 27). Included in the manual is an overview of the skills that case managers in substance abuse treatment settings need to have:
- Understanding various models and theories of addiction and other problems related to substance abuse
- Ability to describe the philosophies, practices, policies, and outcomes of the most generally accepted and scientifically supported models of treatment, recovery, relapse prevention, and continuing care for addiction and other substance-related problems
- Ability to recognize the importance of family, social networks, community systems, and self-help groups in the treatment and recovery process
- Understanding the variety of insurance and health maintenance options available and the importance of helping clients access those benefits
- Understanding diverse cultures and incorporating the relevant needs of culturally diverse groups, as well as people with disabilities, into clinical practice
- Understanding the value of an interdisciplinary approach to addiction treatment
| Tool | Substance type | Patient age | How tool is administered | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alcohol | Drugs | Adults | Adolescents | Self- administered |
Clinician- administered |
|
| Screens | ||||||
| Screening to Brief Intervention (S2BI) | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Brief Screener for Alcohol, Tobacco, and other Drugs (BSTAD) | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription medication, and other Substance use (TAPS) | X | X | X | X | X | |
| NIDA Drug Use Screening Tool: Quick Screen (NMASSIST) | X | X | X | X | ||
| Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-C (AUDIT-C) | X | X | X | X | ||
| Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) | X | X | X | |||
| Opioid Risk Tool | X | X | X | |||
| CAGE-AID | X | X | X | X | ||
| CAGE | X | X | X | |||
| Helping Patients Who Drink Too Much: A Clinician’s Guide (NIAAA) | X | X | X | |||
| Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention for Youth: A Practitioner’s Guide (NIAAA) | X | X | X | |||
| Assessments | ||||||
| Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription medication, and other Substance use (TAPS) | X | X | X | X | X | |
| CRAFFT | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Drug Abuse Screen Test (DAST-10)* | X | X | X | X | ||
| Drug Abuse Screen Test (DAST-20: Adolescent version)* | X | X | X | X | ||
| NIDA Drug Use Screening Tool (NMASSIST) | X | X | X | X | ||
| Helping Patients Who Drink Too Much: A Clinician’s Guide (NIAAA) | X | X | X | |||
| Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention for Youth: A Practitioner’s Guide (NIAAA) | X | X | X | |||
DSM-5 Criteria for Substance Use Disorder
- The substance is often taken in larger amounts or over a longer period than was intended.
- There is a persistent desire or unsuccessful effort to cut down or control use of the substance.
- A great deal of time is spent in activities necessary to obtain the substance, use the substance, or recover from its effects.
- Craving, or a strong desire or urge to use the substance, occurs.
- Recurrent use of the substance results in a failure to fulfill major role obligations at work, school, or home.
- Use of the substance continues despite having persistent or recurrent social or interpersonal problems caused or exacerbated by the effects of its use.
- Important social, occupational, or recreational activities are given up or reduced because of use of the substance.
- Use of the substance is recurrent in situations in which it is physically hazardous.
- Use of the substance is continued despite knowledge of having a persistent or recurrent physical or psychological problem that is likely to have been caused or exacerbated by the substance.
- Tolerance, as defined by either of the following:
- A need for markedly increased amounts of the substance to achieve intoxication or desired effect
- A markedly diminished effect with continued use of the same amount of the substance.
- Withdrawal, as manifested by either of the following:
- The characteristic withdrawal syndrome for that substance (as specified in the DSM-5 for each substance).
- The use of a substance (or a closely related substance) to relieve or avoid withdrawal symptoms.
Screening tools
| Tool | Substance type | Patient age | How tool is administered | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alcohol | Drugs | Adults | Adolescents | Self- administered |
Clinician- administered |
|
| Screening to Brief Intervention (S2BI) | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Brief Screener for Alcohol, Tobacco, and other Drugs (BSTAD) | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription medication, and other Substance use (TAPS) | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention for Youth: A Practitioner’s Guide (NIAAA) | X | X | X | |||
| Opioid Risk Tool – OUD (ORT-OUD) Chart | X | X | X | |||
Assessment Resources
| Tool | Substance type | Patient age | How tool is administered | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alcohol | Drugs | Adults | Adolescents | Self- administered |
Clinician- administered |
|
| Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription medication, and other Substance use (TAPS) | X | X | X | X | X | |
| CRAFFT | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Drug Abuse Screen Test (DAST-10)* | X | X | X | X | ||
| Drug Abuse Screen Test (DAST-20: Adolescent version)* | X | X | X | X | ||
| NIDA Drug Use Screening Tool (NMASSIST) (discontinued in favor of TAPS screening above) | X | X | X | X | ||
| Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention for Youth: A Practitioner’s Guide (NIAAA) | X | X | X | |||
MHSA’s Concept of Trauma and Guidance for a Trauma-Informed Approach
The convergence of the trauma survivor’s perspective with research and clinical work has underscored the central role of traumatic experiences in the lives of people with mental and substance use conditions. The connection between trauma and these conditions offers a potential explanatory model for what has happened to individuals, both children and adults, who come to the attention of the behavioral health and other service systems.
People with traumatic experiences, however, do not show up only in behavioral health systems. Responses to these experiences often manifest in behaviors or conditions that result in involvement with the child welfare and the criminal and juvenile justice system or in difficulties in the education, employment, or primary care system. Recently, there has also been a focus on individuals in the military and increasing rates of post-traumatic stress disorder.
SAMHSA’s Definition of Trauma
Individual trauma results from an event, series of events, or set of circumstances that is experienced by an individual as physically or emotionally harmful or life-threatening and that has lasting adverse effects on the individual’s functioning and mental, physical, social, emotional, or spiritual well-being.
The six key principles fundamental to a trauma-informed approach include:
1. Safety
Throughout the organization, staff and the people they serve, whether children or adults, feel physically and psychologically safe; the physical setting is safe and interpersonal interactions promote a sense of safety. Understanding safety as defined by those served is a high priority.
2. Trustworthiness and Transparency
Organizational operations and decisions are conducted with transparency with the goal of building and maintaining trust with clients and family members, among staff, and others involved in the organization.
3. Peer Support
Peer support and mutual self-help are key vehicles for establishing safety and hope, building trust, enhancing collaboration, and utilizing stories and lived experiences to promote recovery and healing. The term peers refers to individuals with lived experiences of trauma. In the case of children, these may be members of their family who have experienced traumatic events and are key caregivers in their recovery. Peers have also been referred to as trauma survivors.
4. Collaboration and Mutuality
Importance is placed on partnering and the leveling of power differences between staff and clients and among organizational staff from clerical and housekeeping personnel, to professional staff to administrators, demonstrating that healing happens in relationships and in the meaningful sharing of power and decision-making. The organization recognizes that everyone has a role to play in a trauma-informed approach. As one expert stated, “one does not have to be a therapist to be therapeutic.”
5. Empowerment, Voice and Choice
Throughout the organization and among the clients served, individuals’ strengths and experiences are recognized and built upon. The organization fosters a belief in the primacy of the people served; in resilience; and in the ability of individuals, organizations, and communities to heal and promote recovery from trauma. The organization understands that the experience of trauma may be a unifying aspect in the lives of those who run the organization, who provide the services, and/ or who come to the organization for assistance and support. As such, operations, workforce development, and services are organized to foster empowerment for staff and clients alike. Organizations understand the importance of power differentials and ways in which clients, historically, have been diminished in voice and choice and are often recipients of coercive treatment. Clients are supported in shared decision-making, choice, and goal setting to determine the plan of action they need to heal and move forward. They are supported in cultivating self-advocacy skills. Staff are facilitators of recovery rather than controllers of recovery. Staff are empowered to do their work as well as possible by adequate organizational support. This is a parallel process as staff need to feel safe, as much as people receiving services.
6. Cultural, Historical, and Gender Issues
The organization actively moves past cultural stereotypes and biases (based on race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, age, religion, gender-identity, geography, etc.); offers access to gender-responsive services; leverages the healing value of traditional cultural connections; incorporates policies, protocols, and processes that are responsive to the racial, ethnic and cultural needs of individuals served; and recognizes and addresses historical trauma.
The Trauma-Addiction Connection
When a person fears for his/her safety, experiences intense pain, or witnesses a tragic or violent act, that person can be described as having experienced trauma. Levels of resiliency vary from person to person, so reactions to traumatic events are similarly varied. Although frightening experiences impact people at any age, adults will generally be more likely to manage through trauma than children will be. Further, some trauma is repeated or ongoing, such as that of child abuse or military combat. Other examples of traumatic events include car accidents, repeated bullying, street violence, sexual assault, domestic violence, growing up in an unstable home, natural disasters, or battling a life-threatening condition.
If trauma and the feelings associated with it are not resolved, serious long-term issues can develop. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) disrupts the lives of people who have experienced unresolved trauma by negatively impacting their relationships, emotions, physical body, thinking and behavior. PTSD sufferers may experience sleep disturbances, nightmares, anxiety and depression, flashbacks, dissociative episodes in which they feel disconnected from reality, excessive fears, self-injurious behaviors, impulsivity and addictive traits.
Researchers have been studying the connection between trauma and addiction in order to understand why so many drug and alcohol abusers have histories of traumatic experiences. Data from over 17,000 patients in Kaiser Permanente’s Adverse Childhood Experiences study indicate that a child who experiences four or more traumatic events is five times more likely to become an alcoholic, 60% more likely to become obese, and up to 46 times more likely to become an injection-drug user than the general population. Other studies have found similar connections between childhood trauma and addiction, and studies by the Veterans Administration have led to estimates that between 35-75% of veterans with PTSD abuse drugs and alcohol.
The reasons behind this common co-occurrence of addiction and trauma are complex. For one thing, some people struggling to manage the effects of trauma in their lives may turn to drugs and alcohol to self-medicate. Post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms like agitation, hypersensitivity to loud noises or sudden movements, depression, social withdrawal and insomnia may seem more manageable through the use of sedating or stimulating drugs depending on the symptom. However, addiction soon becomes yet another problem in the trauma survivor’s life. Before long, the “cure” no longer works, and it causes far more pain to an already suffering person.
Other possible reasons addiction and trauma are often found together include the theory that a substance abuser’s lifestyle puts him/her in harm’s way more often than that of a non-addicted person. Unsavory acquaintances, dangerous neighborhoods, impaired driving, and other aspects commonly associated with drug and alcohol abuse may indeed predispose substance abusers to being traumatized by crime, accidents, violence and abuse. There may also be a genetic component linking people prone toward PTSD and those with addictive tendencies, although no definitive conclusion has been made by research so far.
First Things First
Sometimes, years of self-medicating through drugs and alcohol have effectively dulled the memory of trauma, so the only problem seems to be substance abuse and addiction. A person who has suppressed or ignored traumatic experiences may work very hard to get and stay sober, only to find other addictive behaviors eventually replacing the drugs and alcohol. These might include compulsive overeating, gambling, sexual promiscuity or any other compulsion-driven behavior. Unfortunately, continuing to avoid resolution of trauma will almost guarantee ongoing suffering.
However, dealing with traumatic experiences is challenging work. Under the influence of drugs and alcohol, it is a nearly impossible task. That is why therapists always recommend working first on recovery from drug addiction and alcoholism. Then, when the trauma survivor is stronger and more clear-minded, s/he can begin working with a therapist in individual or group counseling to address the underlying problem of unresolved trauma. Specific treatment modalities have been developed for people suffering long-term effects after traumatic experiences, including trauma-focused therapies, PTSD Intervention, Body Psychotherapy which targets the physiological response to trauma, and medications for depression and anxiety.
Considering the frequent link between trauma and addiction, anyone working on recovery from substance abuse and addiction could benefit from an assessment by a skilled therapist, to determine if there are underlying issues that should be addressed and to devise an appropriate treatment plan. The best approach is always to work first on living a sober life, then on resolving past trauma and learning positive coping skills, thereby breaking the trauma-addiction connection and finding a better life all around.
Hackensack Meridian Carrier Clinic. (2019). Trauma and addiction. Retrieved from https://carrierclinic.org/2019/08/06/trauma-and-addiction/
For more information, visit carrierclinic.org
The following video, produced by the Carrier Clinic, highlights the significant link between post-traumatic stress disorder and addiction.
The following video examines the ways trauma and addiction are linked. The issue of trauma has become one of the most important concepts in the treatment of addiction.
References
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA.
- Davenport-Hines, R. The Pursuit of Oblivion: A Global History of Narcotics; WW Norton & Company: New York, NY, USA, 2003.
- Booth, M. Opium : A History; St. Martin’s Griffin: New York, NY, USA, 1999.
- Hanson, D. Historical Evolution of Alcohol Consumption in Society; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2013.
- Earleywine, M. Understanding Marijuana: A New Look at the Scientific Evidence; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2002.
- Sournia, J.C. A History of Alcoholism; Blackwell: London, UK, 1990.
- Grinspoon, L.; Bakalar, J.B. Marihuana, the Forbidden Medicine; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 1997.
- White, W.L. Slaying the Dragon: The History of Addiction Treatment and Recovery in America; Chestnut Health Systems/Lighthouse Institute: Bloomington, IL, USA, 1998.
- Lee, M.A. Smoke Signals: A Social History of Marijuana—Medical, Recreational and Scientific; Scribner: New York, NY, USA, 2013.
- Berridge, V. Victorian Opium Eating: Responses to Opiate Use in Nineteenth-Century England. Vic. Stud. 1978, 21, 437–461. [PubMed]
- Shorter, E. The History of Nosology and the Rise of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 2015, 17, 59–67. [PubMed]
- Keller, M.; Doria, J. On Defining Alcoholism. Alcohol Health Res. World 1991, 15, 253–259.
- Markel, H. Über Coca: Sigmund Freud, Carl Koller, and Cocaine. JAMA 2011, 305, 1360–1361. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual: Mental Disorders, 1st ed.; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1952.
- Jellinek, E.M. The Disease Concept of Alcoholism; Hillhouse Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 1960.
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 2nd ed.; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1968.
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd rev. ed.; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1987.
- Howlett, A.C.; Bidaut-Russell, M.; Devane, W.A.; Melvin, L.S.; Johnson, M.R.; Herkenham, M. The Cannabinoid Receptor: Biochemical, Anatomical and Behavioral Characterization. Trends Neurosci. 1990, 13, 420–423. [CrossRef]
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed.; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1994.
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR); American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
- U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDA/HHS). Report of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee on the Dietary Guidelines for Americans; USDA, Agricultural Research Service: Washington, DC, USA, 2010.
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM–5), 5th ed.; American Psychiatric Publishing: Washington, DC, USA, 2013.
National Conference of State Legislatures. State Medical Marijuana Laws. Available online: State Medical Marijuana Laws
Abel, E.L. Marihuana, the First Twelve Thousand Years; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1980.
Carter, T.F. The Invention of Printing in China and Its Spread Westward; Ronald Press: New York, NY, USA, 1955.
Kunisaki, J. A Handy Guide to Papermaking; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1948.
Karch, S.B. A Brief History of Cocaine; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005.
Levy, J.V.; Freye, E. Pharmacology and Abuse of Cocaine, Amphetamines, Ecstasy and Related Designer Drugs: A Comprehensive Review on Their Mode of Action, Treatment of Abuse and Intoxication; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009.
Long, H.; Greller, H.; Mercurio-Zappala, M.; Nelson, L.S.; Hoffman, R.S. Medicinal Use of Cocaine: A Shifting Paradigm over 25 Years. Laryngoscope 2004, 114, 1625–1629. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Merrill, J.L. The Bible and the American Temperance Movement: Text, Context, and Pretext. Harv. Theol. Rev. 1988, 81, 145–170. [CrossRef]
31. Alcoholics Anonymous. Alcoholics Anonymous: The Story of How Many Thousands of Men and Women Have Recovered from Alcoholism, 4th ed.; Alcoholics Anonymous World Services: New York, NY, USA, 2001.
32. Silkworth, W.D. The Doctor’s Opinion. Available online: http://www.step12.com/silkworthdoctors-opinion. html
33. Alcoholics Anonymous General Service Office. Estimates of A.A. Groups and Members as of January 1, 2015.
34. Maines, R. The Technology of Orgasm: “Hysteria,” the Vibrator, and Women’s Sexual Satisfaction; American Council of Learned Societies: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2001.
35. Yorke, C. A Critical Review of Some Psychoanalytic Literature on Drug Addiction. Br. J. Med. Psychol. 1970, 43, 141–159. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
36. Independence Hall Association. Economic Growth and the Early Industrial Revolution. Available online: http://www.ushistory.org (accessed on 21 March 2016).
37. Provine, D.M. Unequal under Law: Race in the War on Drugs; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2008.
38. Fields, H.L. The Doctor’s Dilemma: Opiate Analgesics and Chronic Pain. Neuron 2011, 69, 591–594. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
39. Rosenblum, A.; Marsch, L.A.; Joseph, H.; Portenoy, R.K. Opioids and the Treatment of Chronic Pain: Controversies, Current Status, and Future Directions. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2008, 16, 405–416. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
40. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prescription Painkiller Overdoses in the U.S.; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2011.
41. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Trends & Statistics; National Institute on Drug Abuse: North Bethesda, MD, USA, 2014.
42. Thompson, A.E. Medical Marijuana. JAMA 2015, 313, 2508. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
43. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Behavioral Health Trends in the United States: Results from the 2014 National Survey on Drug Use and Health; Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration: Rockville, MD, USA, 2015.
44. Grabowski, J. NIDA Research Monographs 50, Cocaine: Pharmacology, Effects, and Treatment of Abuse; Diane Publishing Co: Darby, PA, USA, 1994.
45. U.S. Department of Justice. List of Controlled Substances. Drug Enforcement Administration. Available online: http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/schedules (accessed on 15 December 2015).
46. World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014.
47. Wilson, M. DSM-III and the Transformation of American Psychiatry: A History. Am. J. Psychiatry 1993, 150, 399–410. [PubMed]
48. Paris, J.; Phillips, J. Making the DSM-5: Concepts and Controversies; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013.
49. American Medical Association. AMA History Timeline. Available online: AMA History
50. Feighner, J.P.; Robins, E.; Guze, S.B.; Woodruff, R.A., Jr.; Winokur, G.; Munoz, R. Diagnostic Criteria for Use in Psychiatric Research. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1972, 26, 57–63. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
51. Spitzer, R.L.; Williams, J.B.; Skodol, A.E. DSM-III: The Major Achievements and an Overview. Am. J. Psychiatry. 1980, 137, 151–164. [PubMed]
52. Rounsaville, B.J.; Spitzer, R.L.; Williams, J.B. Proposed Changes in DSM-III Substance Use Disorders: Description and Rationale. Am. J. Psychiatry 1986, 143, 463–468. [PubMed]
53. Widiger, T.A.; Smith, G.T. Addiction and Nosology. In Apa Addiction Syndrome Handbook, Vol. 1: Foundations, Influences, and Expressions of Addiction; Shaffer, H.J., LaPlante, D.A., Nelson, S.E., Shaffer, H.J., LaPlante, D.A., Nelson, S.E., Eds.; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2012; pp. 49–66.
54. Edwards, G. The Alcohol Dependence Syndrome: A Concept as Stimulus to Enquiry. Br. J. Addict. 1986, 81, 171–183. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
55. Wakefield, J.C. DSM-5 Substance Use Disorder: How Conceptual Missteps Weakened the Foundations of the Addictive Disorders Field. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2015, 132, 327–334. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
56. Beckson, M.; Tucker, D. Commentary: Craving Diagnostic Validity in DSM-5 Substance Use Disorders. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 2014, 42, 453–458. [PubMed]
57. Hasin, D.S.; Fenton, M.C.; Beseler, C.; Park, J.Y.; Wall, M.M. Analyses Related to the Development of DSM-5 Criteria for Substance Use Related Disorders: 2. Proposed DSM-5 Criteria for Alcohol, Cannabis, Cocaine and Heroin Disorders in 663 Substance Abuse Patients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012, 122, 28–37. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
58. Brown, T.A.; Barlow, D.H. Dimensional Versus Categorical Classification of Mental Disorders in the Fifth Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and Beyond: Comment on the Special Section. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 2005, 114, 551–556. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
59. Krueger, R.F. The Structure of Common Mental Disorders. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1999, 56, 921–926. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
60. Widiger, T.A.; Simonsen, E. Alternative Dimensional Models of Personality Disorder: Finding a Common Ground. J. Personal. Disord. 2005, 19, 110–130. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
61. First, M.B.; Bhat, V.; Adler, D.; Dixon, L.; Goldman, B.; Koh, S.; Levine, B.; Oslin, D.; Siris, S. How Do Clinicians Actually Use the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders in Clinical Practice and Why We Need to Know More. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 2014, 202, 841–844. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
62. Kim, N.S.; Ahn, W.-K. Clinical Psychologists’ Theory-Based Representations of Mental Disorders Predict Their Diagnostic Reasoning and Memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2002, 131, 451–476. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
63. Sobell, L.C.; Ellingstad, T.P.; Sobell, M.B. Natural Recovery from Alcohol and Drug Problems: Methodological Review of the Research with Suggestions for Future Directions. Addiction 2000, 95, 749–764. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
64. Sobell, M.B.; Sobell, L.C. Controlled Drinking after 25 Years: How Important Was the Great Debate? Addiction 1995, 90, 1149–1153. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
65. Sobell, M.B.; Sobell, L.C. Moderation, Public Health and Paternalism. Addiction 1995, 90, 1175–1177. [CrossRef]
66. Volkow, N.D.; Koob, G. Brain Disease Model of Addiction: Why Is It So Controversial? Lancet Psychiatry 2015, 2, 677–679. [CrossRef]
67. Hall, W.; Carter, A.; Forlini, C. The Brain Disease Model of Addiction: Is It Supported by the Evidence and Has It Delivered on Its Promises? Lancet Psychiatry 2015, 2, 105–110. [CrossRef]
68. Heyman, G.M. Addiction: A Disorder of Choice; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009.
69. Beutler, L.E.; Williams, R.E.; Wakefield, P.J.; Entwistle, S.R. Bridging Scientist and Practitioner Perspectives in Clinical Psychology. Am. Psychol. 1995, 50, 984–994. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
70. Fox, R.E. Charlatanism, Scientism, and Psychology’s Social Contract. 103rd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association: Presidential Address (1995, New York, New York). Am. Psychol. 1996, 51, 777–784. [CrossRef]
71. Lilienfeld, S.O. Can Psychology Become a Science? Personal. Individ. Differ. 2010, 49, 281–288. [CrossRef]
72. Stewart, R.E.; Chambless, D.L.; Baron, J. Theoretical and Practical Barriers to Practitioners’ Willingness to Seek Training in Empirically Supported Treatments. J. Clin. Psychol. 2012, 68, 8–23. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
73. Barlow, D.H.; Levitt, J.T.; Bufka, L.F. The Dissemination of Empirically Supported Treatments: A View to the Future. Behav. Res. Ther. 1999, 37, S147–S162. [CrossRef]
74. Forman, R.F.; Bovasso, G.; Woody, G. Staff Beliefs About Addiction Treatment. J. Subst. Abus. Treat. 2001, 21, 1–9. [CrossRef]
75. Herbeck, D.M.; Hser, Y.-I.; Teruya, C. Empirically Supported Substance Abuse Treatment Approaches: A Survey of Treatment Providers’ Perspectives and Practices. Addict. Behav. 2008, 33, 699–712. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
76. Willenbring, M.L.; Kivlahan, D.; Kenny, M.; Grillo, M.; Hagedorn, H.; Postier, A. Beliefs About Evidence-Based Practices in Addiction Treatment: A Survey of Veterans Administration Program Leaders. J. Subst. Abus. Treat. 2004, 26, 79–85. [CrossRef]
77. Mark, T.L.; Kassed, C.A.; Vandivort-Warren, R.; Levit, K.R.; Kranzler, H.R. Alcohol and Opioid Dependence Medications: Prescription Trends, Overall and by Physician Specialty. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009, 99, 345–349. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
78. Knudsen, H.K.; Ducharme, L.J.; Roman, P.M. The Adoption of Medications in Substance Abuse Treatment: Associations with Organizational Characteristics and Technology Clusters. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007, 87, 164–174. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
79. Johnson, R.A.; Lukens, J.M.; Kole, J.W.; Sisti, D.A. Views About Responsibility for Alcohol Addiction and Negative Evaluations of Naltrexone. Subst. Abus. Treat. Prev. Policy 2015, 10, 1–13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
80. Rubinsky, A.D.; Chen, C.; Batki, S.L.; Williams, E.C.; Harris, A.H. Comparative Utilization of Pharmacotherapy for Alcohol Use Disorder and Other Psychiatric Disorders among US Veterans Health Administration Patients with Dual Diagnoses. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2015, 69, 150–157.
81. Compton, W.M.; Saha, T.D.; Conway, K.P.; Grant, B.F. The Role of Cannabis Use within a Dimensional Approach to Cannabis Use Disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009, 100, 221–227.
82. Saha, T.D.; Chou, S.P.; Grant, B.F. Toward an Alcohol Use Disorder Continuum Using Item Response Theory: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Psychol. Med. 2006, 36, 931–941.
83. Shmulewitz, D.; Keyes, K.; Beseler, C.; Aharonovich, E.; Aivadyan, C.; Spivak, B.; Hasin, D. The Dimensionality of Alcohol Use Disorders: Results from Israel. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010, 111, 146–154.
84. Gelhorn, H.; Hartman, C.; Sakai, J.; Stallings, M.; Young, S.; Rhee, S.H.; Corley, R.; Hewitt, J.; Hopfer, C.; Crowley, T. Toward Dsm-V: An Item Response Theory Analysis of the Diagnostic Process for DSM-IV Alcohol Abuse and Dependence in Adolescents. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2008, 47, 1329–1339.
85. Fischer, B.A. A Review of American Psychiatry through Its Diagnoses: The History and Development of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 2012, 200, 1022–1030.
86. Spitzer, R.L. The Diagnostic Status of Homosexuality in DSM-III: A Reformulation of the Issues. Am. J. Psychiatry 1981, 138, 210–215.
87. American Psychiatric Association. Homosexuality and Sexuality Orientation Disturbance: Proposed Change in DSM-II, 6th Printing, Page 44; No. 730008; American Psychiatric Association: Arlington, VA, USA, 1973.
88. Babor, T. Drug Policy and the Public Good; Oxford University Press: Oxford, NY, USA, 2010.
89. Kurtzleben, D. Data Show Racial Disparity in Crack Sentencing. US News & World Report, 2010. Available online: http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2010/08/03/data-show-racial-disparity-in- crack-sentencing (accessed on 8 March 2016).
90. Nutt, D.J.; King, L.A.; Phillips, L.D. Drug Harms in the UK: A Multicriteria Decision Analysis. Lancet 2010, 376, 1558–1565.
91. Van Amsterdam, J.; Opperhuizen, A.; Koeter, M.; Van Den Brink, W. Ranking the Harm of Alcohol, Tobacco and Illicit Drugs for the Individual and the Population. Eur. Addict. Res. 2010, 16, 202–207.
92. Weissenborn, R.; Nutt, D.J. Popular Intoxicants: What Lessons Can Be Learned from the Last 40 Years of Alcohol and Cannabis Regulation? J. Psychopharmacol. 2012, 26, 213–220.
93. Borges, G.; Ye, Y.; Bond, J.; Cherpitel, C.J.; Cremonte, M.; Moskalewicz, J.; Swiatkiewicz, G.; Rubio-Stipec, M. The Dimensionality of Alcohol Use Disorders and Alcohol Consumption in a Cross-National Perspective. Addiction 2010, 105, 240–254.
94. Harford, T.C.; Yi, H.Y.; Faden, V.B.; Chen, C.M. The Dimensionality of DSM-IV Alcohol Use Disorders among Adolescent and Adult Drinkers and Symptom Patterns by Age, Gender, and Race/Ethnicity. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2009, 33, 868–878.
Hasin, D.S.; Beseler, C.L. Dimensionality of Lifetime Alcohol Abuse, Dependence and Binge Drinking. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009, 101, 53–61.
95. Keyes, K.M.; Hasin, D.S. Socio-Economic Status and Problem Alcohol Use: The Positive Relationship between Income and the DSM-IV Alcohol Abuse Diagnosis. Addiction 2008, 103, 1120–1130.
96. Babor, T.F.; Caetano, R. The Trouble with Alcohol Abuse: What Are We Trying to Measure, Diagnose, Count and Prevent? Addiction 2008, 103, 1057–1059.
97. Hasin, D.; Paykin, A.; Endicott, J.; Grant, B. The Validity of DSM-IV Alcohol Abuse: Drunk Drivers Versus All Others. J. Stud. Alcohol. 1999, 60, 746–755.
98. Szasz, T.S. The Myth of Mental Illness. Am. Psychol. 1960, 15, 113–118.
Kendler, K.S.; Gardner, C.O., Jr. Boundaries of Major Depression: An Evaluation of DSM-IV Criteria. Am. J. Psychiatry 1998, 155, 172–177.
Najman, J.M. Commentary on Wakefield & Schmitz (2015): Diagnosing an Alcohol Use Disorder—What Criteria Should Be Used? Addiction 2015, 110, 943–944.
Norko, M.A.; Fitch, W.L. ‘DSM-5 and Substance Use Disorders’: Reply. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 2015, 43, 263–264.
Haass-Koffler, C.L.; Leggio, L.; Kenna, G.A. Pharmacological Approaches to Reducing Craving in Patients with Alcohol Use Disorders. CNS Drugs 2014, 28, 343–360.]
Robinson, T.E.; Berridge, K.C. The Neural Basis of Drug Craving: An Incentive-Sensitization Theory of Addiction. Brain Res. Rev. 1993, 18, 247–291.
Blaszczynski, A. Commentary On: Are We Overpathologizing Everyday Life? A Tenable Blueprint for Behavioral Addiction Research. J. Behav. Addict. 2015, 4, 142–144.
Frances, A.J. DSM-5 Suggests Opening the Door to Behavioral Addictions. Available online: Behavioral Addictions
Frances, A.J.; Widiger, T.A. Psychiatric Diagnosis: Lessons from the DSM-IV Past and Cautions for the DSM-5 Future. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 2012, 8, 109–130.
Kawa, S.; Giordano, J. A Brief Historicity of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: Issues and Implications for the Future of Psychiatric Canon and Practice. Philos. Ethics Humanit. Med. 2012, 7, 2.
Insel, T.; Cuthbert, B.; Garvey, M.; Heinssen, R.; Pine, D.S.; Quinn, K.; Sanislow, C.; Wang, P. Research Domain Criteria (Rdoc): Toward a New Classification Framework for Research on Mental Disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 2010, 167, 748–751.
Goldfried, M.R. On Possible Consequences of National Institute of Mental Health Funding for Psychotherapy Research and Training. Prof. Psychol. Res. Pract. 2016, 47, 77–83.
Schutz, C.G. DSM-V, RDoC and Diagnostic Approaches in Addiction Research and Therapy. J. Addict. Res. Ther. 2012.
Moreno-López, L.; Catena, A.; Fernández-Serrano, M.J.; Delgado-Rico, E.; Stamatakis, E.A.; Pérez-García, M.; Verdejo-García, A. Trait Impulsivity and Prefrontal Gray Matter Reductions in Cocaine Dependent Individuals. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012, 125, 208–214.
Stevens, L.; Verdejo-García, A.; Goudriaan, A.E.; Roeyers, H.; Dom, G.; Vanderplasschen, W. Impulsivity as a Vulnerability Factor for Poor Addiction Treatment Outcomes: A Review of Neurocognitive Findings among Individuals with Substance Use Disorders. J. Subst. Abus. Treat. 2014, 47, 58–72.
Wilcox, C.E.; Pommy, J.M.; Adinoff, B. Neural Circuitry of Impaired Emotion Regulation in Substance Use Disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 2016, 173, 344–361.
Toyokawa, S.; Uddin, M.; Koenen, K.C.; Galea, S. How Does the Social Environment ‘Get into the Mind’? Epigenetics at the Intersection of Social and Psychiatric Epidemiology. Soc. Sci. Med. 2012, 74, 67–74.
